Got feedback on the new design? We're Listening! Send us Feedback
This Story is Archived

Bush to Acknowledge Mistakes in Iraq »

Posted by: MyWayOnNow 1 year, 7 months ago
9.8

Scale of 1 to 10

Read: 10

Propped: 138

Comments: 406

Archived

President Bush will tell the nation Wednesday night he will send more than 20,000 additional American forces to Iraq, acknowledging that it had been a mistake earlier not to have more American and Iraqi troops fighting the war, a senior administration official said

Read Full Story at breitbart.com »

Story Tags What are Tags?

This Story is Archived and Commenting is Closed

Comments: 453
  • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)rushran
    rushran
    Jan. 10, 2007, 9:18 a.m.

    Why dont he and the bush twins go?

    4 Replies

  • Avg rating: (+1/-0 1)jimlin6
    jimlin6
    Jan. 10, 2007, 9:28 a.m.

    Why don't he and the Bush twins go?

    That statement rushran is the only type of solution people with your frame of mind can come up with I will say one thing though, you're good at coming up with a lot of bashing and belly-aching. But there's no credibility in that, is there?

    63 Replies

  • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)rushran
    rushran
    Jan. 10, 2007, 9:29 a.m.

    Bush has screwed this up so bad only pro bushies think he has done good.

    What dont you go sign up and fight then.!!!!!!!!!!!

    5 Replies

  • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)rushran
    rushran
    Jan. 10, 2007, 9:31 a.m.

    Im sick of all of our politicians sending other kids off to war when their kids stay home and not go over there. That bothers me !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    1 Reply

  • Avg rating: (+1/-0 1)doppich
    doppich
    Jan. 10, 2007, 9:47 a.m.

    (So the cokehead is going to admit his 'mistake.')

    More likely, it will be the passive voice, "Mistakes were made." Or one of his, "I take responsibility but it's not my fault."

    • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)Blackace
      Blackace
      Jan. 10, 2007, 11:21 a.m.

      'Hey, don't go throwing stones. you're best man for the pres job obama osama is the admitted coke user and ole BJ clinton didn't inhale. yeah right. But bush has a few drinks and he's the problem. but that's okie dokie."

      Are you for real a few drinks? The point here is neither of these men you mention are in charge of our country...I can give a rat's ass what they are doing, bush is running our country, very badly I might add. A few drinks is an out and out lie and you know it. You GOPers didn't get it in November; people can see through your so call little lies. We, including you, know that he was a Coke head, not just a few drinks "COKE" And just so you know it's an insult to mention Mr. Clinton and this bush in the same vane...it's just wrong Bush couldn't shine Bills shoes this stumbling idiot we have to call president.

      2 Replies

    • Avg rating: (+0/-1 -1)Beeboppin71
      Beeboppin71
      Jan. 10, 2007, 11:49 a.m.

      While I primarily disagree with everything you say, incidently this is a great idea. Test all of the politicians and their staff for drug use.

      • Avg rating: (+1/-0 1)Ebonvoice
        Ebonvoice
        Jan. 11, 2007, 3:43 p.m.

        It's cute that you perpetuate the use of an obviously imflammatory nickname and blame "the media" for starting it.

        What's next, Hogtrashhd? Blaming Redd Foxx and Nick at Nite for calling everyone a "big dummy"?

        • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)jeffery1
          jeffery1
          Jan. 10, 2007, 1:58 p.m.

          So? I've used pot, I've gotten drunk, I know a lot of very successful people who did and do the same, and I don't think that Bush's use was necessarily a problem. The problem with Bush is his ideology and incompetence.

          • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)contrast
            contrast
            Jan. 10, 2007, 2:11 p.m.

            funny you should say coke head barack obama admits his coaine usage in a book he wrote back in 95 I like barack but lets not create a double standard

            • Avg rating: (+1/-0 1)Christalline
              Christalline
              Jan. 10, 2007, 3:17 p.m.

              Honestly, I am going to vote a write in, Rice, I know she doesnt want it, but for the first time in my life, a female is my ideal canidate for President. She has the backbone for it, already knows political leadership from all over the world and is working hand in hand with them already, highly educated, and an extremely respectable " tell it like it is" individual.

              That is my Vote in 08.. "Write in Rice". Since she doesnt want it, noone will get it. =)~~~

              1 Reply

            • Avg rating: (+2/-0 2)jeffery1
              jeffery1
              Jan. 10, 2007, 3:26 p.m.

              Hillary would be a far better President than Bush. She understands how our government was designed to work and would not circumvent the system as Bill did not circumvent the system. Most of the other potential candicates seem to understand that the Presidency is not unitary and was never intended to be. So, most other potential candidates, including Hillary, will not be inherently inclined to abuse the constitution and commit crimes while in office as the ideologically right-wing Bush.

              Now, be a good godservant and fetch his coffee.

              • Avg rating: (+6/-0 6)RedstateLib
                RedstateLib
                Jan. 10, 2007, 4:30 p.m.

                "When Bush serves his time. You can have Hilary. And I'm gonna sat back and watch you fall on the floor throwing a fit screaming and kicking that she stole all you money and isn't doing anything for ya.Mark my words.And I'm gonna enjoy watch you squirm lol"

                You statement only proves that it is not the best interest of this country that you are concerned with, only the best interest of THIS President.

                • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)missc
                  missc
                  Jan. 10, 2007, 9:43 a.m.

                  The Bush invasion in Iraq has bothered me for as long as it has been in existance. It made sense to go after bin Lauden. As far as I am able to understand, it never made sense to go into Iraq. Hussein (who WAS an evil man) is gone. What is it Bush is now trying to "win" in Iraq? If he wants people in the streets (referred to as insurgents, although the word means those who fight against an established government, so maybe it should apply to someone other than the Iraqi citizens) to stop shooting other people in the streets, if he wants people in the streets to stop shooting American young men and women in the streets, he would do well to focus his attention on New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Houston, D.C., etc., etc. If he wants to "win", he got the King, that's called Check Mate in chess, which is a game for smart people, and the game ends. When will he define himself as winning? He wants to set up a "democracy," which we don't really have here.

                  7 Replies

                • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)jimlin6
                  jimlin6
                  Jan. 10, 2007, 9:48 a.m.

                  Like I said in my prior posts on other issues, no matter what Bush does, whether it's right or wrong The left wing will find fault. Even if he "cut-and-run" which is the far left's idea, you would find fault with that also.

                  Like I said before---"get a life"

                  P.S. I already served in the military serving my country. Maybe it's you that should sign-up and go fight. Maybe then you would stop all your left wing rubbish.

                  You want all the freedoms that's been provided and protected for you, but you don't want to do anything to keep them yourself. Bashing and belly-aching won't keep your freedoms.

                  11 Replies

                • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)rushran
                  rushran
                  Jan. 10, 2007, 9:50 a.m.

                  GOing after Iraq isnt protecting my freedom Bush has taking more of my freedoms than past presidents.

                  • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)geogeo
                    geogeo
                    Jan. 10, 2007, 9:58 a.m.

                    Bush is responsible for more than 500,000 deaths. He lied us into this war based on cherry picked intel. Those people who gave him honest advice were dismissed. The constitution he ignored while endorsing torture. But, the truly amazing part of this fiasco that people still believe that Iraquis flew into the WTC, these are all his ignorant supporters.

                    • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)sirat
                      sirat
                      Jan. 10, 2007, 9:58 a.m.

                      Yep, he is crazier than we thought.

                      • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)jimlin6
                        jimlin6
                        Jan. 10, 2007, 10:04 a.m.

                        missc--- You seem to be one of those in the country who just cannot grasp the truth that we are in a war against world wide terror. Yes Saddam is gone, the world is better for it. The battle in Iraq is just one front of that war. We are trying to defeat the terrorists at that front. Another front right now is Somolia. There is a front wherever the terrorists kill and take away freedoms.

                        It really is sad, but there is a segment of society who just cannot or will not adhere to the idea that this is a major problem to all civilized society.

                        Look at the history of the world. Every so often through the centuries, evil gets so bad that civilized people have to snuff it out to survive. We are now in another one of those times. You are always going to have people who can't or won't understand this. Many times these people are just as much a danger as the known enemy.

                        5 Replies