Join the Discussion

Comments So Far: 631

• 100%

  Bobcat61 year, 7 months ago

  Well this country is in for it now. I'm sure the Muslim terrorists will show her just as much respect as they do all women. Not Shrillary. Anyone but Shrillary. So now the democrats have a Clinton for a candidate. They also have a candidate whose father is a Muslim. Good choices. Hee! Hee!

  Reply

  99 Replies

  • 100%

    IcCaRus1 year, 7 months ago

    yep, i know what you mean... aint it pathetic?? specially when you look at all the good upstanding men the reps will run... not a crook, scaliwag, or liar among them.... like i said all great men, well that is if you dont count alcohol and cocaine abuse, lying, corruption, trying to have sex with underage pages, being the guy who should DO something about that, and doing NOTHING, giving the keys to the treasury away to companies like haliburton, etc, etc, etc....

    america is SICK of hearing how the reps are the party of "family values" ENOUGH!! it just isnt true and never has been.... 1/2 a million vets kicked off VA rolls, 3000 americans killed in an unjust war, refusing to sign Kyoto and a treaty to demilitarize space (we were the ONLY country NOT to sign that one), NOT allowing the govt to negotiate better drug prices, the list goes on and on... are these YOUR families values? NOT MINE!!

    wake up america! its not what they say but what they DO that matters

    Reply

    31 Replies

    • 100%

      IcCaRus1 year, 7 months ago

      ps ... something tells me that IF she wins, she WONT appoint an Atty Genl who will sit in front of congress, and with a straight face, say that the Constitution does NOT guarantee due process to american citizens, but "merely" states that the govt cant take it away except under certain conditions... are you kidding me??? who ARE these people?

      Reply

      11 Replies

      • 0%

        lfergie8121 year, 7 months ago

        You mean like our president that never knew that there were three groups in Iraqis that hate each other. Everyone knew that except Bush because they were fighting each other.

        Reply

        5 Replies

        • 56%

          injest1 year, 7 months ago

          Clinton Signed 'Iraq Liberation Act' Into Law 1998

          Clinton October 31, 1998

          THE WHITE HOUSE

          STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT

          Everyone knew that except Bush because they were fighting each other

          Everyone except say, President Clinton and his CO-President Hillary

          The United States favors an Iraq that offers its people freedom at home. I categorically reject arguments that this is unattainable due to Iraq's history or its ethnic or sectarian make-up. Iraqis deserve and desire freedom like everyone else. The United States looks forward to a democratically supported regime that would permit us to enter into a dialogue leading to the reintegration of Iraq into normal international life.

          The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow.

          Reply

          4 Replies

          • 48%

            ybdogsct1 year, 7 months ago

            1) Clinton sought regime change through diplomacy, sanctions, UN inspections, and containment. Bush sought regime change through a heavy-handed, preemptive offensive, unsanctioned by the UN security council. (It's also standing U.S. policy to seek regime change in Cuba, but somehow I don't think Bush plans to invade any time soon.)

            2) Clinton recognized the majority opinion that believed Iraq had WMD, yet he exercised enough prudence to realize uncertainties and dissenting opinions within the intelligence community threw enough doubt that their conclusions couldn't rationalize a preemptive war. Bush distorted the evidence to make the case for war.

            continued.

            Reply
          • 100%

            ybdogsct1 year, 7 months ago

            3) Clinton believed a UN peacekeeping force could have prevented sectarian groups from fighting in the power vacuum following Saddam's removal. UN backing would also lend international and Iraqi legitimacy to the fledgling government. Bush decided to act unilaterally, placing the stress of peacekeeping on our armed services, which were under-equipped and undermanned (according to Shinseki's prewar estimates) thanks to Rumsfeld, allowing sectarian violence to escalate in the resulting power vacuum. Bush's unilateralism also undercuts the legitimacy of the fledgling Iraq government as it is perceived by many to be merely a (non-UN sanctioned) puppet government of the U.S. to help the U.S. plunder Iraq for oil. This distrust of the U.S. and of the fledging government forces Iraqis to take matters into their own hands and again sectarian violence escalates.

            Reply

            2 Replies

            • 0%

              blackolives1 year, 7 months ago

              Is this the same UN that allowed 800,000 Africans to die in Rhawanda, or that is allowing the Muslim government of Sudan to kill of all of the "infidels"? Or maybe it's the UN that allowed 2 million cambodians to be killed by the Communists. Or are you talking about the UN that is supposed to keep the Arabs from raining down missiles on Israel.

              All the UN did under Kofi Annan was allow Saddam to amass a fortune by corrupting UN paper-pushers into letting him sell oil in violation of yet another worthless UN mandate.

              Come on now, if you think that the UN was actually going to stop Saddam from gassing, torturing and murdering his own people you are greatly mistaken.

              And BTW how comfortable are you going to be once Iran develops a nuclear device? Don't count on the UN to stop it.

              Reply

              1 Reply

              • 50%

                ybdogsct1 year, 7 months ago

                BLACKOLIVES WROTE:

                Is this the same UN that allowed 800,000 Africans to die in Rhawanda"

                It's the same UN that receives most of its funding and armed forces from the United States, which largely dictates the agenda despite being only 1 member out of many. Had we wanted to stop Rwanda or Sudan, we could have certainly done a better job of making it a priority at the UN and getting this problem solved.

                BLACKOLIVES WROTE:

                "All the UN did under Kofi Annan was allow Saddam to amass a fortune"

                All the UN inspectors did was successfully contain Saddam and prevent him from having an active WMD program, as the UN was charged with doing.

                http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2006_rpt/srpt109-3

                BLACKOLIVES WROTE:

                "Come on now, if you think that the UN was actually going to stop Saddam from gassing, torturing and murdering his own people you are greatly mistaken."

                Since the arrival of the UN after the 1st Gulf War, they did. Saddam had no active WMDs.

                continued.

                Reply
      • 67%

        FrankieT1 year, 7 months ago

        Ike, you think that carries the same gravity as what Icarus mentioned above. You don't think we all need due preocess?

        Reply

        1 Reply

        • 58%

          IncaQueen6 months, 3 weeks ago

          The only way Hillary will be looked on with respect is if she has Bill neutered. It is the only way the white house aides will be safe from this sexual predator.

          There is actually a very simple operation, that when done as early as possible, can virtually eliminate the risk of prostate cancer in males when they get older. Once you're through having children it's really an option to consider, in other words no further need for procreation, but most males won't submit themselves to becoming eunuchs. It does I'm told work quite well and an older woman prefers their companionship. He's no longer hung up of EDS Dysfunction and taking dangerous drugs, which may actually bring on the onset of prostate problems. The operation takes less than half an hour to complete!

          I say let's neuter Bill then vote for Hillary!

          Reply
      • 0%

        LordyLordy1 year, 7 months ago

        Can we start the "impeachment proceedings now" before she gets in.

        I'm not a Republican nor a Democrat but I believe that's what the left wing liberals did to President Bush.

        Reply

        2 Replies

        • 75%

          ybdogsct1 year, 7 months ago

          LORDYLORDY WROTE:

          "I'm not a Republican nor a Democrat but I believe that's what the left wing liberals did to President Bush."

          If that was the case, how would you explain Bush's high approval ratings following 9/11?

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W_Bush#Critici

          "In the time of national crisis following the September 11 attacks, Bush enjoyed approval ratings of greater than 85%, maintaining 80-90% approval for four months after the attacks."

          While some questioned the legitimacy of his election to office, Bush enjoyed high approval ratings and the unanimous support of Congress following 9/11. His abysmal approval ratings and loss of congressional support (even among many Republican lawmakers) was earned by his poor performance in office. He squandered domestic & international goodwill through his failed foreign policy, his neglected domestic policy, scandals during his administration, and incidents of corruption & incompetence.

          Reply

          1 Reply

          • 75%

            LordyLordy1 year, 7 months ago

            I've actually have very kind thoughts about President Bush, even felt sorry for him as President. You need to pray for him daily, to make the right decisions. He actually inherited this war in Afghanistan and Iraq from the previous President, what's name...oh yeah, Clinton. Some people fail to remember he started the war with the radical Muslim terrorists. THEY ARE CONNECTED, as well as many other violent clashes we are and were having with the radical Muslim elements in the Middle East. Backup to Bierut, USS Cole, the US Embasies, Bali, Iran during Jimmy Carter. Did you forget the WhiteWater or White House Travel Agency scandal?

            At least this President knows who the enemy is. Would we have been this blind during WWII we would have lost.

            Can you say Trojan Horse? This is exactly what is happening. The Muslims, including the terrorist variety, are coming to a neighborhood near you. You are not safe. While you sleep their invasion has already begun, including the PR invasion.

            Reply
    • 64%

      jay611 year, 7 months ago

      Whats Pathetic is no matter whos in office your all full of it. Republicans especially. Don't blame all spending on Dems, Repubs do a heck of a bang up job too. They just hide it better.

      Reply

      13 Replies

      • 0%

        IcCaRus1 year, 7 months ago

        jay-

        actually these days, it seems like youre right. doesnt matter which party is in power, both screw the american people for the benefit of their contributors and special interests.

        Reply

        9 Replies

        • 100%

          protoham1 year, 7 months ago

          Well this will be fun, as they bring up whitewater and other stuff again. Hang on for a ride!!

          Reply

          8 Replies

          • 81%

            ybdogsct1 year, 7 months ago

            In case you hadn't noticed, millions of taxpayer dollars were already spent on a Whitewater investigation that "fully and completely discharges Hillary Rodham Clinton from all criminal liability for alleged violations of federal criminal law."

            http://icreport.access.gpo.gov/watkins.html

            Reply

            6 Replies

            • 0%

              capecoralM1 year, 7 months ago

              Well since you opened the door on this one I wonder why Vince Foster, remember that Vince Foster who committed Suicide during all this crap?, would hand her his phone and have Watkins, while at his daughter graduation tell her that things at the Travel office were being taken care of if she had nothing to do with the firings. I mean that sounds a little wierd. Why would Watkins be telling her "Things are being taken care of" if she had nothing to do with it. By the way that was her testimony I am referring to. God help us through another four years of a Clinton run whitehouse.

              Reply

              5 Replies

              • 0%

                lfergie8121 year, 7 months ago

                Your statement sounds a little weird to me. How would you know this took place? Do you have a link to this or is it all hearsay from a repub "news" source?

                Reply

                1 Reply

                • 93%

                  injest1 year, 7 months ago

                  Now I really want to know what exactly was in those top-secret document Sandy Burger stole and destroyed

                  Reply
              • 0%

                ybdogsct1 year, 7 months ago

                CAPECORALM WROTE:

                "Why would Watkins be telling her "Things are being taken care of" if she had nothing to do with it."

                I cite the Whitewater report prepared by an Independent Council and assisted by a Special Prosecutor (who clearly disliked the Clintons) that clearly absolves Clinton from all criminal liability, and you post your personal conjecture? That's supposed to overturn the official results of entire Whitewater investigation?

                Reply
              • 83%

                FrankieT1 year, 7 months ago

                With Hillary in there you WILL have God helping you, Cape. (:

                Reply
              • 0%

                Blackace1 year, 7 months ago

                capecoralM - You are correct god help us we might be able to save the middle class in America under Clintion... Maybe even bring our jobs back home. I think the country can use some real brains in the White House it's been 8 years of air headisms...

                Run Hill Run and having bill with her we will get 2 presidents for one!

                Reply
          • 87%

            jordan111 year, 7 months ago

            Well this will be fun, as they bring up whitewater and other stuff again. Hang on for a ride!!>>>>

            I'm going to pass when it all starts. 2000 & 2004 were enough BS for a lifetime. Doesn't matter who runs on the democratic ticket. The CONS will once again ignore facts and issues, and just smear. Who needs it? Not me.

            Reply
      • 100%

        Twistoflex1 year, 7 months ago

        If you look at the fiscal data available at the US Treasury site you will see that every Democratic administration since Kennedy brought the budget more in line (lowered the deficit) and every Republican administration elevated it - especially with Reagan, who spent more than all previous administrations combined. The same is true of the Dumbya dictatorship. It has spent more than all of the previous administrations combined. Where has all the money gone? Certainly not into infrastructure and services for the people. It has gone into no-bid contracts for cronies. These are transfer payments from the taxpayers directly into their pockets - regardless of the scandals and absence of performance (ex. Halliburton).

        Reply

        2 Replies

        • 0%

          Blackace1 year, 7 months ago

          I bet Bush and the entire bunch will be highly paid advisers after they are out, where the money will be funnel to them.

          Reply

          1 Reply

          • 0%

            LordyLordy1 year, 6 months ago

            ..and why not. Slick Willie is being paid anywhere from $300,000 to $500,000 per appearance, and I'm told may even be considering marketing his own line of tasty cigars.

            Reply
    • 0%

      r2me21 year, 7 months ago

      "Party of family values" Yeah right. The values they take from others for their families is the real meaning of that.

      Enough of Reps., enough of liars, enough is enough.

      A woman for president. It's about time.

      I would like to know what the Reps. that had a sticker on their bumpers when Bill was president: don't blame it on me, I didn't vote for Clinton.

      I wonder if they say now: "Blame it on me, I voted for Bush".

      No, they don't say that.

      A WOMAN FOR PRESIDENT"

      Let;s give t a try. Why not?

      Reply
    • 0%

      blackolives1 year, 7 months ago

      That's cute. You probably don't live in a large city run by Dummycrats where 700-800 people are murdered every year. I love how you scream about 3000 military deaths in a war that's lasted over 3 years. That many people are muredered in NYC in that time frame.

      Of the Republicans probably running for President, including McCain, and Guliani, please tell me which one was a crook, or had sex with a page.

      You are probably thinking of Obama, who is even now doing crooked realestate transactions with an indicted felon named Anton "Tony" Rezko. I bet you didn't know that, but here in Chicago it is pretty common knowledge, just check the Sun-Times. Of course the national media has not yet reported the story.

      Or another crook Hillary Clinton. I wish I had her investment savy, turning a small time investment into hundreds of thousands of dollars. You don't have facts to back up your labels. Use your intellect not you emotion and we might respect you libs a little more.

      Reply

      3 Replies

      • 0%

        Blackace1 year, 7 months ago

        You mean cities run by republicans like NYC, Boston and the likes?

        Reply
      • 0%

        r2me21 year, 7 months ago

        I'm glad you find it cute. I didn't know what you say about Obama and I don't care. what I know is that "to be a politician you have to be dirty" said by R. Reagan. I bet you didn't know that. One more example: R. Nixon. I bet you didn't notice that the # of homeless increased around your neighbourhood when R.Reagan was president. It happened.

        What's wrong if people scream about >3,000 solders dead in Iraq. If the peolpe of their country don't, then who will? Iran? Cuba? Get real. there's a needless war out there and many peole are acting like they don't care. meanwhile our deficit keeps growing and you and I and the rest of the country and our children and our children's children will be paying for that. What you say about people dying in our cities that happens all the time but those are our internal problems, however soldiers are needlessly dying because your governement is trying to solve the problems that occur overseas and neglect to see the ones of their own country

        Reply
      • 0%

        r2me21 year, 7 months ago

        Cont. Then you say "please tell me which one was a crook, or had sex with a page" Politicians had sex with somebody else outside their marriage, is that new? FDR, JFK, and around the corner in your neighbourhood is happening. People cheat. Is that new? Oh yeah, I forgot the puritans are still watching as if they were really pure. Keep on dreaming. Those guys that I mentioned were working hard trying to fix our internal problems because they were elected to do so. The one who occupies the presi"dunce" right now, in my opinion which happens to match the opinion of many people in this country is not even trying to stop the crime that is occurring in your big city, because he imposed some big cuts that the police force had to decrease in number. He is more worried about giving the millionaire a huge tax break thatn keep the country running properly.

        Hillary for president, why not? Let's give it a try.

        Reply
  • 0%

    somecommonsense1 year, 7 months ago

    In my honest opinion I think she is a good politician and a good legislator however she won't win, there is far to much venom and hate on the right side of the aisle, there will be witch hunts, and tons of lies, and god forbid if she makes Obama VP, also a very intelligent guy, probably would make a great VP, the right will call him osama as some idiots on this site already have, they will point to his Muslim father as a negative, cause apparantly republicans are racist and narrow minded...but at the end of the day if she wins it won't matter, NOTHING will change...really ..I mean maybe there will be some smarter policy decisions both foreign and domestic, some logical policy shifts, perhaps a roll back of taxes on the top 1% to hellp pay for all the stuff george bought... but the gov't will still be run by the increasingly corrupt lobby system, which exists to serve the needs of Multi-National Corps, and not us. It will be an ugly campaign..one of the worst in our history I believe.

    Reply

    39 Replies

    • 0%

      jordan111 year, 7 months ago

      I want to see Obama as President...not VP. Time for a change.

      Reply

      8 Replies

      • 88%

        not2needy1 year, 7 months ago

        YAY jordan11, Kudos.

        Reply
      • 78%

        protoham1 year, 7 months ago

        Obama seem to be a genuine person, but he has no experience. And I have no idea what his hidden agenda is. Everyone has a hidden agenda.

        Reply

        3 Replies

        • 91%

          Blackace1 year, 7 months ago

          bama seem to be a genuine person, but he has no experience. And I have no idea what his hidden agenda is. Everyone has a hidden agenda.

          It could not be as bad as Mr. Bushes hidden agenda! It's the oil stupid. I know, after the people we have running this country today i would wonder if everyone lies and vheat and sleep with little boys...

          Reply
        • 92%

          sailr1 year, 7 months ago

          Maybe NO ESPERIENCE is just what we need? He hasn't had time to learn all the bad habits of the corrupt politicians yet.

          Reply
        • 0%

          FrankieT1 year, 7 months ago

          So positive, aren't you?

          Reply
      • 100%

        elrod1 year, 7 months ago

        Alfred E. Newman has a better chance.

        Reply

        2 Replies

        • 0%

          Waveswing1 year, 7 months ago

          He'd probably do a better job than any of these clowns that have ever been in office!

          Reply

          1 Reply

          • 0%

            earthlingerer1 year, 7 months ago

            I don't think anyone could say, considering how "new" he is and his current lack of a voting record.

            "Dark horse" (no pun intended) at best.

            Reply
    • 0%

      somecommonsense1 year, 7 months ago

      At least we won't have to hear about Vietnam for once...I'm sure the Swift Boat Veterans for Lies and Distortions are hard at work crafting a commercial to slander Hillary, or maybe the right can resurrect Kenneth Starr and he can spend a couple hundred million more of MY hard earned dollars investigating so called shady land deals and travelgate. I advocate voting 3rd party to send a message that the status quo is not working, our system is broken, the lobby system run by MNC's rules our country and crafts our foreign and domestic policies and we need to take back our government and have REAL accountability...

      Reply

      3 Replies

      • 100%

        sailr1 year, 7 months ago

        The problem with your third party is you don't have a prayer of winning anything and all you do is split the vote and allow people like Bush to be elected! If not for Nader, we could have avoided the disaster that George Bush is! Gore would have won hands down!

        STOP SCREWING UP ELECTIONS JUST TO "SEND A MESSAGE". IT BACKFIRES ON ALL OF US!

        Reply

        2 Replies

        • 100%

          kam801 year, 7 months ago

          If it hadn't been for Ross Perot, Clinton would not have been elected. He split the Bush 41 vote.

          STOP SCREWING UP ELECTIONS JUST TO "SEND A MESSAGE." IT BACKFIRES ON ALL OF US!

          Reply
        • 0%

          somecommonsense1 year, 7 months ago

          ok who should I vote for? I will vote for who you tell me to...that makes perfect sense, please educate me...

          also i voted for gore, and Gore should have won regardless of Nader, I think he actually did, remember, the 3rd party debate is too long and complex to debate here, but don't give me that simplistic "split the vote" reasoning, its nonsense..

          Don't tell me how to vote!

          Reply
    • 100%

      MonkeyBiz1 year, 7 months ago

      Are you dense or do you just sound that way? Dems sponsored civil rights legislation, not the GOP. To some Republicans credit, enough of them went along to get it passed despite rabid opposition from most of their own party. The GOP filibustered the civil rights act fer crying out loud. Yes, Abraham Lincoln was a republican, but the South claimed to be fighting for states rights, something that the modern reps rant and rave about. States rights is a GOP party platform. You have it all backwards I'm afraid.

      Reply

      6 Replies

      • 100%

        ybdogsct1 year, 7 months ago

        IKE5266 WROTE:

        "Are you still mad we freed your slaves and voted overwhelmingly to support civil rights in the '60s and defeat Democrat-sponsored Jim Crow laws and segregation?"

        The terms "Democrat" and "Republican" switched during the course of history. What is fairly constant is:

        1) It was the South that primarily supported slavery.

        2) It was the South that primarily supported Jim Crow laws.

        3) It was the South that primarily supported segregation.

        4) It is the South that represents the base of the Republican party.

        1) It was the Northeast that generally opposed slavery.

        2) It was the Northeast that generally opposed Jim Crow laws.

        3) It was the Northeast that generally opposed segregation.

        4) It is the Northeast (both coasts actually) that represents the base of the Democratic party.

        Crediting the current crop of neoconservatives with the abolition of slavery, Jim Crow laws, and segregation shows a lack of understanding of American politics.

        Reply

        3 Replies

        • 63%

          achildatheart1 year, 7 months ago

          Yeah right, Just ask Democratic Senator Robert Byrd of VA. He knows all about racism affirmative action he voted against it.

          Reply

          2 Replies

          • 80%

            ybdogsct1 year, 7 months ago

            "Yeah right, Just ask Democratic Senator Robert Byrd of VA."

            First, Robert Byrd is a senator from West Virginia, not Virginia. Secondly, last time I checked West Virginia was part of the South, so Byrd does inherit some Republican values (i.e., anti-gay marriage). Thirdly, affirmative action is too complex an issue to call anyone who opposes it a "racist."

            Besides, I'd rather ask Trent Lott (R-Mississippi) what he thought of Strom Thurmond (R-South Carolina). If my memory serves me correctly, Republicans voted Trent Lott back into party leadership even after he had already been forced to relinquish his position as Senate Majority Leader due to statements he made saying the U.S. would have been better off if segregationist candidate Strom Thurmond had won the presidency in 1948. Thurmond said: "We stand for the segregation of the races and the racial integrity of each race."

            continued.

            Reply
          • 89%

            ybdogsct1 year, 7 months ago

            Or ask George Allen (R-Virginia) of his racist characterization of a James Webb staffer as a "macaca."

            Or ask Bob Corker (R-Tennessee) who pulled ahead in the Tennessee election only after airing a racist ad that played on the fear of interracial relationships by suggesting the unmarried Harold Ford had an affair with a blonde woman at a Playboy Party. In fairness, some Republicans opposed the ad. "The ad was denounced by many people, including former Republican Senator William Cohen, who called it "a very serious appeal to a racist sentiment.""

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Ford_Jr.#Contr

            Or ask Dick Cheney about how he allowed the Republican leadership to use gay marriage as a political wedge to scare "values voters" into voting Republican even though his own daughter (Mary Cheney) is gay, pregnant, and planning to raise the child with lesbian partner Heather Poe.

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Cheney#Pregnancy

            Reply
      • 89%

        blackolives1 year, 7 months ago

        Please learn your history before you spout out untruths. It was the Southern "Dixiecrat" Democrats who attempted to fillibuster and sink all civil rights legislation. One of your great party leaders, Robert KKK Byrd D-WV, was a grand wizard of the Klu Klux Klan. Civil rights legislation was introduced by President Johnson, a democrat, and passed by a combination of Dems and Republicans with the strong opposition of the Democratic party.

        Even to this day, Republicans appoint the firts Black Secretary of State (Powell), then do it again (Rice). They run as Republicans for Senator in Illinois (Keyes), Maryland (Steele) and Pennsylvania (Swann) and are called uncle toms by White Liberals who are scared to death to lose the votes. These are the same white liberals like Howard Dean, who on a campaign staff of 100 have no persons of color whatsoever.

        As more and more blacks become aware of your hypocrisy, I don't think you will have that vote locked up forever.

        Reply
      • 0%

        bs76781 year ago

        you wrong. the southern democrats hughey p long . especially did a great job at filibustered the civil rights act and the vote act that gave a group the right to vote that should have had them all along.The only rights the southern states democrats fought for state rights was to keep the blacks in thier place.

        Reply
    • 100%

      protoham1 year, 7 months ago

      She has been a politician for what, 6 years? How does that qualifier her for commander in chief or president? She has a lot to learn before she is ready for the job.

      Obama has the same problem.

      Maybe in 20 years.

      Reply

      5 Replies

      • 0%

        ybdogsct1 year, 7 months ago

        "Maybe in 20 years."

        Because Bush had 20 years of experience in the federal government before he was elected? By the time the 2008 election has arrived, both Clinton and Obama will have more experience at the federal government level than Bush had.

        Reply
      • 100%

        jordan111 year, 7 months ago

        She has been a politician for what, 6 years?>>>>

        How long was bush a politician? And did he do a good job when he was?

        Reply

        3 Replies

        • 0%

          ybdogsct1 year, 7 months ago

          Jordan11 asked a genuine question. The least you can do is honor it with a complete answer, rather than dismiss it with a snarky one-liner.

          Reply
        • 100%

          r2me21 year, 7 months ago

          No hi did not. How was Texas when he left?

          In bad shape. How is the country going to be by 2009? In bad shape too.

          Reply

          1 Reply

          • 90%

            bs76781 year ago

            texas was doing good. He got both parties to work togeather. as for the country its running good. 4.5% unemployment is great since the democrats status is 5% unemployment is full employment. clinton left with a high 8% unemployment going up with factories going to mexico. We got factories adding to or building more here now to meet demand. We got over 11000 illeagals working here. So yes this country is going strong look at the stockmarket. But you will never here a democrat or a democrat controlled media say anything good. You need to read the local papers for a more clearer picture becouse the big city papers are controlled by liberals with the so intent to bash the president.

            Reply
    • 0%

      PatrioticAmerican1 year, 7 months ago

      Hillary wont win for 2 Reasons, 1 She is a woman (i think she is anyways), and 2, Repubs around the country will come out in force to make sure she doesnt. If it came down to Butch oops i mean hillary, and McCain, I think i would vote for my dog. and as for Obama Binladen he is hidding something otherwise he would freely talk about his Muslim upbringing and his studying of islam.

      Reply

      11 Replies

      • 0%

        somecommonsense1 year, 7 months ago

        Patriotic American, perhaps you can't read..

        1. never said Republicans were racist you took my quote out of context..

        2. I agree Hilliary won't win for thes reasons posted above...

        3. And again a right winger posts nothing but slander and insults...i.e. Obama BinLadin(You guys do realize how ignorant you sound when you say that right? "he is hiding something?" like what?! LOL He's a christian and by the way a little FYI...there is nothing wrong with being Muslim...just in case you missed the memo...quite frankly having someone who knows a little about Islam and has studied Islamic studies, not sure how much he did though, that's a GOOD thing...unlike if someone such as yourself was President who makes fun of people's names...do you know how dumb that is...I mean Jeffrey Dahmer was a serial killer, it's a pretty common American name...should we be suspicious of all jeffrys LOL!

        Reply

        10 Replies

        • 100%

          somecommonsense1 year, 7 months ago

          4. Again it doesn't matter we are sqabbling over the small stuff, while the corporations and lobbyists rewrite our constitution, gain increasing control over the levers of government and I could care less who wins President in 08...I'm voting for change, I'm voting 3rd party.

          5. Oh and another good point calling Hillary a Butch LOL...very illuminating...

          6. And how long was Bush in office before he ran???? hmmmm 5 years...and what a bang up job he did in texas...bankrupted the state...lol, the only reasons he won was , his dad, his ownership of the Rangers and Rove. he was a failed buisness man and failed in hie congressional run...

          7. Like I said this is all BS anyway...it doesn't matter, the powers that be want you guys to argue about same sex marriage all day to keep your eye of the real problem..THE LOBBY SYSTEM...and of course MNC's.

          Reply

          6 Replies

          • 100%

            sailr1 year, 7 months ago

            PLEASE don't invoke the 3rd pary thing! It screws up the elections and gives the wrong people the victory! Look at what Nader did to this country in 2000! If Nader had kept his nose out of it, Gore would have been President and we Never would have gone into Iraq!

            Reply

            5 Replies

            • 70%

              IcCaRus1 year, 7 months ago

              america would be sssooooo much better off if nader had stayed out of it

              Reply

              1 Reply

              • 60%

                eddie1071 year, 7 months ago

                I agree with you about one part, but then again, I have to keep hoping that someday, the American people will notice that the 2 party system is bending them over and raping them, and actually do something about it. Considering the supreme court situation, I had to vote Ind. or Dem. If I know that the 2 party system is screwing me, why would I keep supporting it?

                The reality was that Nader was a better candidate than either side had. He just didn't have the money to get noticed, and most polls didn't even list him as a candidate. That is the joke that our electoral system is. It is as corrupt as a sewer.

                Reply
            • 0%

              Star_Poet1 year, 7 months ago

              a 3rd party would be better than the two we have now!

              Reply
            • 80%

              somecommonsense1 year, 7 months ago

              PLEASE don't tell me how to vote...your just caught up in the nonsense, you don't realize you actually have a vote, yet you WASTE it voting for these made up partys...YOUR vote is wasted, I am not "screwing" up anything, I'm voting...if, if , if , if Gore won, some things would be better, I was really upset when he lost, or won actually, I voted for him, I thought the sky was going to fall, but you know what if he was President, so much in the world would be the same, and so much in this country would be same, and corruption would still rule our government and the lobby system and MNCs would still be crafting our policies and controlling more of our government than ever before in our nation's young history...Your argument is simplistic, I hear what your saying, i used to think like you, but I realize now this is all a joke, these message boards are a joke, people argueing about abortion, and taxes, its nonsense, the real issues never get addressed

              Reply
            • 92%

              bs76781 year ago

              we need a third party, tired of the same old people running. doesn't matter republican or democrat they been in control so long they forgot they work for us the citizen's,not the party like the democrats said after getting to much flak on the immigration bill and that we had no right to tell them how to vote or that they will be out of office,at the next election. republicans said the same thing.So we need a party that will listen to us who vote them in. Instead of kissing up to us to get elected and then complain when we contact them giving our concerns about certian bills. saying they do what they need to for the party, and not what the voters want. they work for us,not the party. I am for seeing every republican and democrat unseated who been in over 6 yrs and not done anything for what we put them in there for.

              Reply
        • 38%

          PatrioticAmerican1 year, 7 months ago

          perhaps you missed the story about how obama wont talk about his muslim teachings and studying islam i would be curious as to why he wont talk about it if its not a bad thing he should be talking freely about it

          Reply

          1 Reply

          • 88%

            jordan111 year, 7 months ago

            I don't know that what you say is true, but even if it is, what does it have to do with his Presidential run? Unlike you, Barak Obama is a Constitutional law expert, which means he understands our Constitution....inside and out. It means he studied the founders of our nation. It means that 'he' knows that no religious test is EVER to be required to run for public office, and he isn't going to disrespect that by being sucked into such nonsense. He's showing respect for the document and its principles that give YOU your freedom. Meanwhile, you spit on it by even bringing up his 'religion.' When are you people going to start respecting this nation? Stop acting like uninformed little children, will ya?

            Reply
        • 100%

          achildatheart1 year, 7 months ago

          He admitted to using cocaine while in college, but he didn't inhale right??? LOL

          Reply
    • 100%

      r2me21 year, 7 months ago

      I agree with you "some". Nothing will change, some things may change even though it will take a long time and a lot of effort to change or clean the mess in what we are right now thanks to you know who.

      It took a long time to Texas to leave the hole in what it was when W. left to be "elected" president with some uncounted votes, thanks to his brother.

      Let's see. Time will tell.

      Reply
  • 94%

    mswmba1 year, 7 months ago

    It is folks like this one who make me proud to be a female, a Democrat, a lesbian, a social worker, and a supporter of Hillary Clinton. Dude, it's 2007, not 1959...

    Republican family values=incest, child abuse, hypocrisy, being miserably married, beating your wife and children, all while pretending "things are fine at home."

    Reply

    22 Replies

    • 100%

      mswmba1 year, 7 months ago

      Actually, "munching rug" has strengthened my "little brain" and made it smarter, which is obviously more than I can say for you. I would highly recommend you take a grammar class. And don't worry, gay marriage will be a reality before you know it!!!

      And how did I know that some lonely, bitter straight person would bash me as a proud lesbian? What an embarassment for the straights...I love my straight, gay-friendly friends who are not threatened by me.

      Reply

      12 Replies

      • 0%

        elrod1 year, 7 months ago

        "Actually, "munching rug" has strengthened my "little brain" and made it smarter"

        If that were the case you wouldn't have made such a stupid comment to begin with.

        Reply
      • 88%

        SamMyam1 year, 7 months ago

        rug-munchers. interesting term, when you think about it. does that mean those men among us who have also visited the Temple of the Rug on numerous occasions have earned the same name?

        Reply

        5 Replies

        • 100%

          elrod1 year, 7 months ago

          I'm not sure, but if that's the case I'm changing my screen name.

          Reply

          4 Replies

          • 75%

            SamMyam1 year, 7 months ago

            well, might I suggest one, based on the intellectual content of your posts?

            "Wanker" comes to mind...

            Reply

            3 Replies

            • 100%

              elrod1 year, 7 months ago

              I've got one for you, How about D*****bag. I'm sure you can fill in the blanks.

              Reply

              2 Replies

              • 100%

                IcCaRus1 year, 7 months ago

                ah yes... another comment from the family values folks

                Reply

                1 Reply

                • 100%

                  elrod1 year, 7 months ago

                  The family values folks?? I really don't see how your post makes sense. Care to elaborate?? I hope you are not insinuating that because I don't agree with the ultra liberal view that I am a right wing religious fanatic. The world is not black and white, there are a lot of gray areas.

                  Reply
      • 0%

        ouzie-q1 year, 7 months ago

        Badda Bing! Ohhhhh Dayammm...

        "Looks like the Bulls are on Parade!"

        You gotta love that homeschoolin' Carpet Crunchin', salad tossin' good time.

        Sounds like somebody needs Hillary's number.

        Reply
      • 0%

        PatrioticAmerican1 year, 7 months ago

        I for 1 am not "THREATENED" by the Gay Men and women in this country, or for that matter around the world, I actually feel sorry for them, because the bible says that sleeping with 1 of your own sex and blood is a MORTAL SIN, and they just can not or refuse to see that point, so to be Gay and Religious would make you a hypocrite

        Reply

        3 Replies

        • 63%

          Eagle_Eye1 year, 7 months ago

          I wonder if my 2 gay parrots are sinning and damned??

          Reply

          1 Reply

          • 0%

            eddie1071 year, 7 months ago

            I used to have a lop eared bunny that was completely in love with my springer spaniel, The humiliation that that poor dog went through, He could never take a nap when Carot was around or he would get a very rude awakening. Does that mean I wont see either of them in heaven too?

            Reply
        • 100%

          Natureboy1 year, 7 months ago

          Hypocritical? What about christians? Bashing queers while worshipping a guy who ran around in a dress, hung out with a bunch of other guys and wouldn't quit talking about "brotherly love." What's up with that?

          Reply
    • 0%