Got feedback on the new design? We're Listening! Send us Feedback

Cindy Sheehan: Twin Towers' Collapse Looked Like Controlled Demolition »

Posted by: entropy 1 year, 3 months ago

14 Comments Report this Story

5.0

Scale of 1 to 10

Read: 41

Propped: 25

Comments: 14

Click Prop It to Raise Score
Prop it

"Sheehan, who made headlines this week after she distanced herself from the Democratic party and the establishment left, joined Alex Jones to share her views on her skepticism towards the official 9/11 story."

Read Full Story at 911truth.org

Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 14
  • 0%
    entropy1 year, 3 months ago

    "On 9/11, Sheehan expressed her support for the Jersey Girl's petition, which calls for a new independent investigation of the terrorist attacks, slamming the 9/11 Commission Report as a "total travesty and a smokescreen."

    "George Bush and Dick Cheney held hands and testified behind closed doors, not under oath," said Sheehan, adding, "There are many things that just don't add up on that day."

    I knew this would be Sheehan's next step. It was only a matter of time.

    Reply
    • 0%
      engineer1 year, 3 months ago

      Cindy Sheehan knows in her heart that 9/11 was an inside job. Amen!

      Reply
      • 0%
        RedRiverJ1 year, 3 months ago

        She is really someone I"d believe. She is such an authority.

        Reply
        • 0%
          entropy1 year, 3 months ago

          But hey, 1 out of every 3 Americans agree with these "wackos." Strange how there's more and more of these "wackos" everyday.

          Reply
          • 0%
            white-pawn1 year, 3 months ago

            And when she gets tired of it, or is otherwise silenced, someone else will come along to take her place. Get used to it until we have the truth.

            Reply
            • 100%
              ETproductions1 year, 3 months ago

              I watched one of the films that reportedly shows out-blasts every 20 floors or so, which would be consistent with a controlled collapse with explosives. But try as I might, I never managed to find an authoritative news clip showing the same thing. It's so easy to edit such things in (or out) that it just leaves me scratching my head and wondering.

              As far as I can see, the only "evidence" we know isn't faked is that the PNAC white paper of 1999, after outlining why we must attack Iraq in order to launch a domino effect of Middle East democracy and secure a cheap, plentiful supply of oil for the us, went on to say that the only way that could happen is if there were a Pearl Harbor style attack against the USA.

              Reply
              • 0%
                wallyone1 year, 3 months ago

                there were no terrorists, no fire destroying buildings, no plane that hit the pentagon.. 911, as was oklahoma, was an inside job.. sooner or later someone may fess up but those who don't believe now will not believe later.. it is unfortunate so many have been so baffled and i am not talking about cindy, alex or myself here..

                Reply
                • 0%
                  pierogi1 year, 3 months ago

                  I was there on 9/11. Seven people who rode the bus with me that morning were murdered that day, along with about 150 residents of Staten Island. You know the total murdered that day was over 3000.

                  I witnessed the collapse of both buildings. There were no explosions when the towers collapsed, just the roar of collapsing steel, office equipment and human beings falling to the ground. There was no shock wave from an explosion. How do I know? I was there and did not see the sides of the building blowing outward. I was raised in a coal mining town in Pennsylvania. They set off charges in an open pit coal mine next to my town on a regular basis. Once you hear an explosion you never forget the sound.

                  I spent some time in both towers over the years. 50,000 people worked in both buildings. How the hell could someone smuggle in multiple explosive charges, rip out the walls, statigically plant them on the support beams in two 110 story buildings and not be noticed.

                  Reply

                  3 Replies

                  • 33%
                    Pyramids2Projects1 year, 3 months ago

                    Granted that explanes WTC 1&2, truth be told I watched the whole event on TV live and it didn't look like an controled explotion to me....but what of WTC 7? that fell in a really neat pile which is just not possible with out explosives. you could set charges in any building disguised as fire extinguishers or telecommunication junction boxes etc who would notice? if it was the will of some shadow element in the government it would not have been difficult to pull off. The process has been used in other countries!!

                    Reply

                    2 Replies

                • 82%
                  aniokly1 year, 3 months ago

                  Our little Cindy is an expert, alright. Unless you get someone credible to take up your cause no one will believe it. Here is a clue, it has to be an Independent, not Republican, or Democrat. And it cannot be anyone who is easily corrupted, like Michael Moore.

                  Reply
                  • 0%
                    nakedtruth1 year, 3 months ago

                    Good call Cindy. You're starting to see beyond the veil.

                    Reply
                    • 0%
                      Ausguy1 year ago

                      I must reply to pierogi.

                      "50,000 people worked in both buildings. How the hell could someone smuggle in multiple explosive charges, rip out the walls, statigically plant them on the support beams in two 110 story buildings and not be noticed."

                      Firstly no walls needed ripping out. All the support columns were accessable from the service well through a DOOR.

                      Secondly it takes 2 people 6 hours to rig a floor and at most 5 floors would be enough.

                      Thirdly the WTC towers were completely empty for long periods prior to 9/11 due to drills.

                      Fourthly, on Sept 8/9 there was a power down that disabled the security cameras and door locks (for 30 hours).

                      Lastly, the buildings were patrolled by bomb sniffing dogs. These were withdrawn on Sept 5th.

                      I dont neccessarily support the controlled demolition theory but there are enough holes in the official version that until there is an investigation into why/how the buildings collapsed a controlled demolition can not be ruled out.

                      Reply
                      Next 25 comments

                      You must be signed in to post a comment. Sign in »

                      Submitted By:
                      entropy

                      "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like ...

                      Related Articles:

                      Why not submit a story?

                      Also Propping This Article

                      view all »

                      Groups Watching This

                      No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your group?

                      Advertisement