Mr. Bush, You Must Resign! »
Posted by: scriblerus1 1 year, 2 months ago906 Comments Report this Story
Bush's commuting of Libby's sentence is the culmination of nearly seven years of Bush's putting partisan politics above the good of our nation. He must now resign.
Read Full Story at msnbc.msn.com
Join the Discussion 
+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 906
-
100%
scriblerus11 year, 2 months ago
Though legal, Bush's commutation of Libby's sentence smacks of quid pro quo and cover-up. With this heinous act, Bush has, as Olberman puts it, stabbed us in the back and turned the Constitution on its head.
Reply-
75%
Neophile1 year, 2 months ago
I highly recommend this commentary in video form.
Also available here: http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/07/03/keith-...
Reply-
MichaelRhodenteComment removed: User banned.184 Replies
-
100%
Neophile1 year, 2 months ago
"Is it too much to ask that they get to the busness (sic) of the country, rather than trying to tear it apart for polical (sic) gain?"
No it isn't. And that is all the U.S. has been asking of the Bush administration for about 6 years now.
P.S. Happy 4th of July, America!
Reply-
MichaelRhodenteComment removed: User banned.102 Replies
-
0%
dunkirk1 year, 2 months ago
ROFLMAO, it never fails, use a REPUBLICAN tactic on a REPUBLICAN and they start whining. GOtta luv it, so predicatable.
Reply-
0%
Baltimore1 year, 2 months ago
What else would you come to expect from a follow-da-leader Bushie, no "Bwaaahhahahahhh" whining, and something original?? Thats just to much to ask! LOL!:>
Reply-
MichaelRhodenteComment removed: User banned.33 Replies
-
100%
nccneon1 year, 2 months ago
Understand the Rodent and his kind. They don't come here to discuss issues. They come here to pick a fight and show their arse. If you think about it, it makes sense that this sort of personality would religiously adhere to Bush, in full blown defiance of common sense. He says "that all ya got?" ... just like a playground bully who's been punched but wants more fight. Remember Shrub's "bring it on"?
Reply-
0%
deathray1 year, 2 months ago
I see that that was pretty much all the Mouse had...
Thanks ncc.
(Now watch the Mouse come back because he got a verbal wedgie from ncc...)
Reply -
100%
scriblerus11 year, 2 months ago
Rodent's kind defended the Third Reich in April 1945 when Hitler's realm had been reduced to a few blocks of bombed-out Berlin. They are true believers in the very worst sense of the term.
Reply-
0%
libsRfunny1 year, 2 months ago
"Rodent's kind defended the Third Reich in April 1945 when Hitler's realm had been reduced to a few blocks of bombed-out Berlin. They are true believers in the very worst sense of the term."
Wow, the brown shirts are at it again. The gang mentality among you left-wingers is truly appalling.
Reply-
100%
dunkirk1 year, 2 months ago
"The gang mentality among you left-wingers is truly appalling."
ROFLMAO, Maybe you should look at the ding list for my original post onhere. Seems the LuvDaDork gang is dinging away. Altho it IS interesting when you realize my original post in this thread is also applicable here. Use a REPUBLICAN tactic on a REPUBLICAN and they start whining.
Reply -
40%
donald511 year, 2 months ago
Libs, its not a left thing when almost 80% of Americans think this way, the more saner Americans obviously, most likely not the richest though! Ah, but don't you just wish it could only be the 18% who are actual libs! What a fool to ignore reality and continue to support this unamerican president... makes you unamerican!
Reply-
50%
nccneon1 year, 2 months ago
He clearly still believes Bush is a conservative, even though that clearly is not true.
And now, the Bushies (distinct from Republicans or conservatives) are starting to feel a bit defensive, they think we're ganging up on them. I am very familiar with being in the minority, so I can empathize with them. It is a good feeling to be in the majority for a change. They've had more than their share of that ; )
Reply -
0%
injest1 year, 2 months ago
Donald51
Libs, its not a left thing when almost 80% of Americans think this way
Ah yes polls again, so when 86% of Americans think the new Dem congress is screwing the pooch, should they resign, change direction or continue on as if the 86% don't matter? (Hint: they ignored the 86%, so much for following polls)
Latest Gallup Poll Found American Confidence In Congress At An "All-Time Low" Of 14% (Confidence In Congress At All Time Low," USA Today's "Gallup Guru" Blog, 6/20/07)
Public Approval Of Congress Is At "Its Lowest Level In More Than A Decade."
(Los Angeles Times, 6/12/07)
"Pelosi's Approval Rating In California Since March Has Plunged"
(Contra Costa Times, 7/2/07)
"Confidence" in Congress is at all time low 14% not because of Bush"
(villagesoup.com)
BTW, where do you get this 80% you cite? Reference please.
Reply-
0%
deathray1 year, 2 months ago
injest -
In spite of all the attempts by the right to discredit the Congress, 57% of people still want Democrats in charge of Congress, and 31% prefer Republicans.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/06/29...
By the way, that poll was taken less than a week ago.
Just goes to show you that the Republicans are not a preferred choice to Democratic control of Congress...but nice try.
Reply -
lovermanComment removed: User banned.
-
50%
donald511 year, 2 months ago
injest, 49 dems, 49 Repugs and 2 indep in the Senate with the Repugs generally still supporting party over conscience and the rule of law. The fault is the Repugs generally as Pelosi has virtually done all she promised including trying to open the door to diplomacy with all Iraq's neighbors to save Iraqi and American soldier lives!
Reply -
100%
dunkirk1 year, 2 months ago
ROFLMAO, I enjoy the polls the righties are referencing in terms of COngressional approval as if it refers ONLY to the Demsd. Or have the Repugs pulled a Cheney and claied they aren't part of Congress anyore?
Seems they always omit the WHY the American people have rated it so low. Seems to be they want an IMPEACHMENT. THe American people are aware which party is holding up the wagon and Sparky its YOURS.
Reply
-
-
100%
injest1 year, 2 months ago
Ah, but don't you just wish it could only be the 18% who are actual libs!
What a fool to ignore reality and continue to support this unamerican president (You mean Congress yes at 14%)... makes you unamerican!
Reply
-
-
0%
NewsWarrior1 year, 2 months ago
Statements like "defended the Third Reich" are hardly productive.
But libs, I'm not a part of any "gang of libs," nor do I have ANY desire to be ( I rarely post here), but it's clear the so-called "Mouse/Rodent" has no real cogent defense of the White House.(Why did we go into Iraq, again?)
Furthermore, this is only poignant in the face of - as Olberman put it (pretty close to the mark) - "a rabid and irrespnsible corner of" (I would say) the private sector. Our Commander-in_chief's Texas-brand of stubborness, and sh*!-eatin' grin "You can't git me, I'M the President!" attitude has served the corporate interests behind the War well.
The evidence is all AROUND us that the Iraq War was a HEINOUS scheme, and for that alone Bush should resign. It's almost comical that Bush's pardon of Libby was given BEFORE the appeals process was finished! For God's sake, let's drop the egos and admit we've fallen prey to an administration run amok.
Reply
-
-
-
100%
libsRfunny1 year, 2 months ago
"Understand the Rodent and his kind. They don't come here to discuss issues. They come here to pick a fight and show their arse."
Really? And yours is some kind of intelligent discussion?
"He says "that all ya got?" ... just like a playground bully who's been punched but wants more fight. Remember Shrub's "bring it on"?"
The only bullying going on is form you and your leftist buddies with you lil gang mentality.
Libby wasn't pardoned, just commuted. He's still on the hook for many things but now is free to pursue his appeal- and win. Then, justice will be served, unlike in that sham trial in which he was "convicted."
Clinton did far worse in selling pardons during his last month in office.
Reply-
0%
dunkirk1 year, 2 months ago
"Then, justice will be served, unlike in that sham trial in which he was "convicted.""
I would imagine the REPUBLICANS would be familiar with that, kinda like what they did to Clinton.
It is pretty apparent tho use REPUBLICAN tactics on a REPUBLICAN and you can ber guarenteed he'll start whining. LuvDaDork does THAT ALL the time.
Reply-
0%
Silverghost1 year, 2 months ago
All this fanfare & spewing hatred does not square with the 135 pardons, many convicted felons & drug pushers, which our former Prez slipped in on Jan 20, 2001: http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pardonchartlst.htm
Some of our citizens are so used to infidelity & sleaze that the sexual exploits of Slick Willy doesn't bother them.
But if a man is unfaithful to his wife, can you count on him to be faithful in serving his country?
It seems to me that many are listening to worse than Hanoi Jane in this era. BTW, there were considerably more of our troops that suffered over there, but we have become more gutless.
Considered what a current 60 yr old soldier says about the war in Iraq, directly checked for validity: http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/repya.asp
I also am tired of the liberal whining & denial of facts that I hear on these sites. -Rev. S
Reply-
0%
dunkirk1 year, 2 months ago
roflmao, Why LuvDaDork ganging up..... I thought that was something ONLY Dems did.
Reply -
0%
dunkirk1 year, 2 months ago
"I also am tired of the liberal whining & denial of facts that I hear on these sites. -Rev. S"
The only denial of facts Ive seen is from the righties. Lies to start a war, illegal wiretaps, politicizing the Judicial branch, stonewalling investigation after investigation, etc etc etc. THOSE are the FACTS.
Reply-
64%
Silverghost1 year, 1 month ago
Whine, whine, whine. Why don't you read what the seasoned Lt. Repya said?
There is no proof of lies; wiretaps were legal & justified for security; the Supreme Court is back to upholding the law according to the Constitution, not making new laws; GW is acting in the position & authority as President, but so many political antagonists want their way, they can't restrain themselves from clawing at him, attempting to bolster their own position. Where is statesmanship among these piranhas?
And, of course, the liberal media doing all it can to keep the hate fires fanned. We are shooting ourselves in the foot, just as the Islamic militants wish.
If the Democrats had a viable plan & would attempt to bring constructive effort to a victory against terror, the enemy would fear & Congress might begin to have a better than 14% rating by the populace. -Rev. S
Reply
-
-
0%
hamy1 year, 2 months ago
Wait! Denial of facts?? If you can still support a president who has clearly put his own political agenda ahead of the good of the people then it is you who is in denial of the facts my good sir.
How dare you!
Bush has done more damage to our country in 6 years than the entire cold war. It will take decades to undo what his tyranny has wrought.
Reply-
67%
Silverghost1 year, 1 month ago
Read my reply to Dunkirk above, Hamy. Why would you say, "How dare you!"? Are you suggesting sanctioning speech, as well as your aiding & abetting the undermining of our military? Perhaps you also should read what Lt. Repya said. -Rev. S
Reply
-
-
55%
MRCOFFEECAKE1 year, 2 months ago
Jane Fonda helped save over
10,000 American lives.
It took courage to end what no
one had the courage to do!
Rudi Giuliani (your hero) wasn't faithful,
nor Jimmy Swaggart or Jim baker,
probably because they had ugly wives..who cares?
You look to them for guidance until
you see that they are unfaithful to their wives?
Do you admire gays who stay faithful?
I doubt it.
So it's only vows that YOU see as important?
How about the constitution and the respect
owed to our young military to keep them out
of harms way unless it is a CLEAR AND PRESENT danger, and the pledge to take care of them once they got home?
New Orleans vets have no home to go back to, many are
losing their homes and not getting quality care.
Their president's infidelity mean nothing to them.
You need a stronger litmus test.
I'd rather have a leader who screws women,
than one who screws little boys or the entire country!
Boy have they fooled you!
Stay loyal to my woman and I can do anything I want@
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
JohnQPublicComment removed: User banned.5 Replies
-
40%
libsRfunny1 year, 2 months ago
"If you feel so strongly about the topic then defend your guys against the comments - Show where anything that was stated was factually incorrect - you can can't you? I mean that is why you are making the snide and juvenile responses toward others comments - right?"
Because they are snide and juvenile. You know liberals are incapable of debating based on facts - only emotion. Their gang-mentality posts are a prime illustration.
Reply-
-
0%
donald511 year, 2 months ago
to libsR a gang mentality is having almost everybody telling her she is wrong... and with facts she ignores! Poor thing!
Reply -
0%
Lurch1 year, 2 months ago
>Their gang-mentality posts are a prime illustration.
You mean like 70% `gang mentality`?
I can understand why you`re feeling a little picked on.
I think a lot of people make the mistake of associating a president or a party with your own self worth or pride. Same thing with their favorite sports team. Same mentality. If your team loses, it can ruin your day or week.
Look, we all get burned sooner and(!) later, it happened to a lot of us with Clinton & Monica, NAFTA for the unions, and so on. Now with Bush, it is just your turn (x10). No need to associate his words (lies) or actions (some unconstitutional) with yourself. In fact, best to try to avoid ever associating yourself with a pol. This way, you can step back and say something like, `well Bush may have been poor on implementation and even crossed the ethical/legal line a few times, but my belief in conservative principles of xxx, yyy, and zzz still stand.`
Reply
-
-
-
100%
Dave591 year, 2 months ago
Seems to be enough for a fool such as yourself there Rhodente. As I see you couldn't post any substantial response to it.
"Is that all you got?" What a frigging tool.
Reply
-
-
100%
star531 year, 2 months ago
what else? follow clintons and the dem-kill babies-raise taxes-kill health care-take religion out for a another religion( godless)too mention a few.....
Reply-
-
100%
Bacalao1 year, 2 months ago
I don't know what planet she is on, But, If I were 30 years younger I might have been willing to try the drugs she is on.
Reply-
25%
tanglang1 year, 2 months ago
She's not on drugs bac. The problem you are having is that the drugs YOU took in the sixty's are finally wearing off. Welcome to reality Bacalao.
Reply-
100%
Bacalao1 year, 2 months ago
The problem is that, I am at this moment only 41. And I said that I "might have been willing to try", not that I did. Sorry Babe I don't use illicit drugs, Prescription drugs(prescribed or otherwise), I just quit cigarettes, I do love to drink (I had one B52 shot four days ago) I'm just not a heavy drinker, I don't even "get high on the lord".
Can you say the same?
Reply-
-
-
-
-
67%
tanglang1 year, 2 months ago
Sorry bac,
First, I think that it is great that you quit smoking, and do not use drugs. That's awesome.
Second, I have not had a cigarette in seven and a half years I had two drinks last year, and an italian barolo last week with dinner. I think only the weak minded need drugs and alchohol get through life. After injuring my back a year ago in a car accident, I can honestly say that not once did I accept a prescription for pain pills or muscle relaxers.
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
100%
tanglang1 year, 2 months ago
Sorry bac,
First, I think that it is great that you quit smoking, and do not use drugs. That's awesome.
Second, I have not had a cigarette in seven and a half years I had two drinks last year, and an italian barolo last week with dinner. I think only the weak minded need drugs and alchohol get through life. After injuring my back a year ago in a car accident, I can honestly say that not once did I accept a prescription for pain pills or muscle relaxers.
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0%
LiberalsRgreedy1 year, 2 months ago
OK, let's go tit for tat: Q: Is there any corporation in the country where a CEO would NOT be fired for sexual acts with interns in his office? No. But, a direct lie "I did not have...", a cover up, and finally after the sucker came out with the facts, the suckee admitted. Anything else you want to say Bush has done that Clinton hasn't? Hmmm, let me see: How about bombing a WWII ally? Do you know your history or are you just 18 year old whiners? When the leader would not resign Clinton bombed the water and electric plants, killing civilians and causing years of suffering for the civilians. Look it up, starts with "Yugo".
Reply-
-
0%
dunkirk1 year, 2 months ago
"Is there any corporation in the country where a CEO would NOT be fired for sexual acts with interns in his office?"
Please feel free to supply proof for that statement?
A better question would be is there any corporation in any country where the CEO wouldnt be fired for telling lies to the stockholders that resulted in disaster for the company. Enron comes to mind.
Reply -
0%
jackoinla1 year, 2 months ago
LibrGreedy - I can't believe you posted that. Were you still asleep or something? "Anything else you wanna say bush has done that Clinton hasn't?". OMG, have you been asleep of almost six years? Try and open your mind a little and look at the mess this country is in Worldwide rather than cling to your defense of a poor leader, albeit, democrat, republican, conservative, liberal or whatever. Such an attitude is so non-productive. There are boys dying in Iraq now, right now,but you seem to think its justifiede because Clinton had issues with "Yugo" and that makes it ok.
I don't care what happened then, there's nothing I can do about it but, if there is a chance that this war is cut short by just one day, all this back and forth would be worth it.
Reply-
0%
Bacalao1 year, 2 months ago
Was that last sentence written the way I read it. Because I read it with rightous anger and national pride. If so bravo my friend, BRAVO.
Reply -
57%
blackolives1 year, 2 months ago
Try not to be so much of a hypocrite. Bush has made some terrible choices, mainly his refusal to take of the gloves in the Iraq war, and his mishandling of the border by refusing to stop the flood of illegals. If you are mad at him about the Scooter Libby pardon, you should first look at the list of people that Clinton pardoned. The list includes narco-trafficking kingpins, who paid of the Clinton family law firm for a pardon, as well as Mark Rich, who nearly bankrupted the bank of England, and stole tens of millions of dollars. It's also interesting to note that Sandy Berger, the national security advisor under Clinton, was caught, and plead guilty to stealing classified documents from the National archives, by hiding them in his underwear, and then shredding them at home. We still don't know to this day, their meaning, value or import, yet he never saw a day of jail time. Grow up you liberal whiners. When you hold your own corrupt leaders to task you'll gain some credibiltiy.
Reply
-
-
0%
dunkirk1 year, 2 months ago
"Clinton bombed the water and electric plants, killing civilians and causing years of suffering for the civilians."
Pssst 4 years after the invasion and Iraq still doesn't have reliable water and electric service.
"How about bombing a WWII ally? "
Pssst Yugo was originally aligned with Nazi Germany and after being knocked out by the Russians declared war on the Germans via the Russian occupiers. So I guess YOU are that 18 year old whiner.
Reply -
0%
donald511 year, 2 months ago
LiberalsR, more of that Faux Fox Facts revisionist history from you. For example, it was NATO that declared war and the secretary General of Nato wasn't even American. Also, look up UN resolution 1199, I believe, and it tells Milosovic to pull all his security and military forces out of Kosovo. God, help us from these right wing liars who get their lies from the well funded, Republican spin machine! Did you know at one point that Tonu Blair offered 54,000 British ground troops to invade Kosovo too? These are all facts you can't ignore... or you can just go back to fox ignorance!
Reply -
38%
deathray1 year, 2 months ago
More moral relativism from LibsRgreedy -
So, behavior bu Clinton, condemned by the right, is heartily embraced by same, when it's Bush.
Reply -
lovermanComment removed: User banned.
-
-
-
-
0%
Bigtone1 year, 2 months ago
I don't think anybody read your post or they simply chose to ignore it. But your right, Clinton's pardons are ignored. Some people are blind and stupid.
Reply-
0%
galaxy101 year, 2 months ago
So what you people are saying is, since Clinton pardoned people he should not have pardoned, it's all right for Bush to do the same? How about looking beyond the partisan and just expecting what's right of from all our leaders? Why do people constantly just look Rep and Dem? Talk about hypocrites. How about looking at this one event as the blow it is against the common people of this nation. Libby got off (and he will be pardoned before Bush leaves office) simply because he's one of the elite. Now is a time for outrage against our pathetic leaders. Not for the childish "well Clinton did it too!" Is anyone here capable of dropping the the partisan politics of their party and looking at the leaders as individuals who are simply screwing up our country?
Reply-
67%
donald511 year, 2 months ago
...give a link to all these criminals... who at least served some time in jail as the justice guidelines were until Libby's release?
How about the bomber free in Miami for blowing up a Cuban civilian passenger liner - a patriot Ollie North calls him, and 76 innocents are dead!
I'm gald the CIA is releasing their older files... as we will see a lot more validation of terrible foreign policy under Republican presidents.
Reply -
0%
willottica1 year, 2 months ago
Half of the people on here complaining about Bush are NOT democrats, they're just people who are angry. And they are angry at people like you who say that only party lines matters, Republicans should protect their own, Democrats should protect their own. Pardon the expression, but COWPIE, if someone's breaking the law, if someone's acting immorally, if someone in office is ignoring the people. HANG THEM OUT TO DRY! Don't put up with them because they belong to your party, hold them to the same standards you set for yourself.
Bush has spat on the judicial system. 3 judges and a jury saw fit to sentence this guy to 30 months in jail based on their knowledge of the law (which I can GUARANTEE is better than GWB's), he should have NO RIGHT to reverse their decision to save a friend's bacon. AND NEITHER DID CLINTON, but CLINTON is not the issue at hand here!
Reply-
100%
laimelady1 year, 2 months ago
ITA Thank you
I'm an Independent... no longer want to be associated with any ONE party.
I want responsibility and accountability from government.
GOP created an independent prosecutor to have at it with Clinton, why can't this Congress create one to impeach Baby Bush? GW took an oath to protect the Constitution and instead he ripped it to shreds.
Ironic that the original GW worked to stay out of politics and this one acts like there's been a return to GIII monarchical rule.
Reply
-
-
-
0%
donald511 year, 2 months ago
second, your exagerations are duely noted... as well as your false conclusions. If you think Dems are more evil than a party that has demonstrated through legal convictions at the highest level of our government, then you have no moral compass. Watergate, Iran Contra and now Plamegate with the Repug party - nuff said! The Libby pardon with no jail time goes with Hastert's not doing anything as a result of either the Foley or Abramoff scandals - what an unscruppled party!
Oh yes, I'm an indep who voted Repug until the 2000 election when I saw through the Dubya lies!
Reply -
0%
deathray1 year, 2 months ago
The real hypocrisy here is that the law and order Republicans ignored the judge, a jury, and the whole jurisprudential system, including mandatory minimums for obstruction of justice, after the Supreme Court, with Alito and Roberts, upheld a sentence for a crime almost exactly like Libby's.
See Rita v. United States.
Reply -
0%
scriblerus11 year, 2 months ago
secondchance: Actually, I've seen a number of liberal posts here stipulating that Clinton was wrong to pardon many of those he pardoned, including especially Marc Rich. Maybe you should read the thread before you stick your neck out.
Reply -
JohnQPublicComment removed: User banned.1 Reply
-
-
0%
spkguy1 year, 2 months ago
Lets not forget Gerald Ford's pardon of Richard M. Nixon, which, while effectively short-circuiting an ongoing probe of possibly the most egregious behavior of any US President,and can really be rationalized as a healing gesture?
Reply-
0%
spkguy1 year, 2 months ago
Or Ronald Reagan's pardon of Yankee owner George Steinbrenner, who had pleaded guilty to violating election laws.
Reply-
0%
spkguy1 year, 2 months ago
And how about what former President George Bush did. He protected himself--a former Reagan Administration official--in an ongoing investigation when he pardoned Reagan's Defense secretary, Casper Weinberger, and the rest of the Iran/contra gang of six.
Reply-
0%
spkguy1 year, 2 months ago
secondchance
"Sorry, but BJ Billy pardoned more criminals during his term then all other recent presidents combined!"
You may just want to do a little fact checking before making a statement like that, because your wrong.
Ford granted 534 pardons
Reagan granted 393 pardons
Bush Sr. granted 74 pardons
Clinton granted 396 pardons
http://www.usdoj.gov/pardon/actions_administrat...
Reply-
-
-
0%
scriblerus11 year, 2 months ago
Republican quote: "Facts? I don't need no stinkin facts!" Bush defenders make up their own "facts."
Reply
-
-
75%
spkguy1 year, 2 months ago
secondchance
"That's correct, if you want to hear both sides of the story and want the facts then you have no choice but to tune into Fox News."
You can't be serious!
http://www.netscape.com/viewstory/2007/04/27/fo...
Fox News Sinks To New Low, Repeatedly Reports Parody Story As Actual News
On Tuesday, Fox News morning show "Fox & Friends" aired at least eight segments on a purported "news" story that was actually a parody article written by a publication similar to The Onion.
Remember they wen't to court for the right to lie.
Reply-
0%
scriblerus11 year, 2 months ago
These Fux fans are absolutely delusional. How does one get both sides of a story if one side is Fox's side? Fox is nothing but RW propaganda. The rest of the mainstream is not much better than Fox, so in reality we get not much of the story at all unless we go to Common Dreams or Alternet or The Nation.
Reply
-
-
0%
donald511 year, 2 months ago
Second, you don't remember the 2003 PIPA Study that showed that 80% of the time regular fox viewers were wrong, worst in the nation for any regular news viewers. Then there was the the analysis that Fox viewers were more often wrong when compared to Jon Stewart viewers that came out just over a week ago. Must be tough knowing you are part of the sycophantic 25% still supporting this unamerican president!
...and Brit Hume thinks John Dean was the rightleader of Watergate... all meant to coverup a Dem sponsored prostitution ring - what BS! Go ahead and believe it second!
Reply -
0%
scott42611 year, 2 months ago
"Fox News is the ONLY TV news source who actually report the facts and report BOTH sides of a story"
ROFLMAO!!!!!!
My sides ache after that one!
Reply
-
-
100%
spkguy1 year, 2 months ago
seconed
and Islamic terrorist as well."
Any links any proof for that statement?
I'll wait for your proof..
Reply -
0%
inaroundabout1 year, 2 months ago
When it's shown that you're in the wrong, deflect. You really are up on your Rove playbook reading.
Reply -
43%
deathray1 year, 2 months ago
You are incorrect, he has pardoned 114 people, and 4 commutations thus far. Please be accurate.
The relative parsimony of the Administration of clemency is only part of what makes the Libby commutation stink to high heaven, but thanks for making that point.
Reply -
67%
Bacalao1 year, 2 months ago
"Funny you didn't mention that Bush JR. has only pardoned 40 people."
Im sorry his numbers aren't up on the official USDOJ site. All the others are though. You wouldn't have a link to bush' #s would you? If so please post.
Don't forget ollie North got a pardon for dabbling in that biz too, although it was under presidential orders.
If you don't believe he did ask anyone in western Arkansas. They will also tell you that our ex-gov Clinton was involved too.
Reply-
100%
scriblerus11 year, 2 months ago
All this proves what I said before: Bush defenders make up their own facts or get them from Fox Noise, which also makes up their facts out of pure cotton candy.
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
