Join the Discussion

Comments So Far: 22

• 0%

  engineer1 year, 1 month ago

  Probably another political plum.

  Reply

  3 Replies

  • 0%

    bumbaklotartattack1 year ago

    Oh, you mean you don't like the precedent he set, letting American citizens be classified as "enemy combatants"?

    http://donklephant.com/2007/09/16/who-is-michae...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_B._Mukasey

    You must be a terrorist with al-Qaeda.

    Reply
  • 0%

    engineer1 year ago

    I made a mistake. After further research, I find Mukasey might be good.

    Reply
  • 0%

    HistoricallyCorrect1 year ago

    If Reagan appointed him, this guy must be the second coming of Jesus.

    Reply
• 0%

  Francisca1 year, 1 month ago

  Nominating Mukasey could cause Bush trouble from the conservative right????How?

  Reply

  1 Reply

  • 0%

    aceofspades11 year ago

    Nominating Mukasey could cause Bush trouble from the conservative right????How

    Because the guy actually has some brains

    Reply
• 0%

  ETproductions1 year, 1 month ago

  He sounds like a well qualified Jurist. He's an ex Federal Prosecutor and well respected on both sides of the isle.

  Reply
• 0%

  enero321 year ago

  Errrr, wasn't Gonzo also considered "well qualified"?

  Reply

  8 Replies

  • 0%

    Antitax1 year ago

    He was , and more so than Reno who in addition to killing 180 men women and children in Waco fired 93 US attorneys opposed to 9. But who is splitting hairs. She was a democrat and that stuff is expected and acceptable. The D next to her name made all the difference.

    Reply

    7 Replies

    • 0%

      Will13131 year ago

      Reno who in addition to killing 180 men women and children in Waco

      ----

      actually is was waaaaay less than that...76.. actually..

      I'm suprised you didn't also blame her for Ruby Ridge.. but then I guess It was OK since that was Daddy Bush.. killing women and children...

      and what should the government's reaction when federal agents are shot trying to serve a warrant..

      Reply

      6 Replies

      • 0%

        jaspersneed1 year ago

        They weren't "trying to serve a warrant", They were storming the house, with weapons. Please don't drag this up if you're just going to be rewriting the facts. It was an armed government assault on citizens, plain and simple.

        Reply

        5 Replies

        • 0%

          crespi1 year ago

          Under the Patriot Act groups like Branch Davidians could be classified "enemy combatantants" and be shot down like dogs by Homeland Security. Legally, without any media notification.

          Just exterminated like bugs...

          Hey, you conservatives WANTED this. Hope you like it...

          Reply

          4 Replies

          • 0%

            djrevelky1 year ago

            But yet no American citizens have been shot down like dogs after their homes were stormed. Too bad Reno can't say the same huh?

            Reply

            3 Replies

            • 0%

              jaspersneed1 year ago

              The hell they haven't been. You been in a coma the last half a decade?

              Reply

              2 Replies

              • 0%

                djrevelky1 year ago

                OK, which Americans did Bush order killed by the military after their homes were stormed?

                Reply

                1 Reply

                • 0%

                  jaspersneed1 year ago

                  Oh, so now Bush had to have ORDERED it? What's your analogous point -- that Clinton ORDERED the Davidians to be murdered? Don't be so stupid please. The Davidians were murdered by our government as a whole, just as any number of other American citizens have been, no matter which president it happened under, and regardless of whether it was the military, the National guard, the police, the ATF, the DEA, the FBI, SWAT, or any of the other Alphabet Thugs in uniforms and jackboots that actually did it. While you're busy with the "let's blame it all on Clinton" game that you bushtards love to play, you miss the fact that Central State aggression against citizens goes unchecked, regardless of president or party.

                  Reply
• 0%

  aceofspades11 year ago

  This guy is no hack like Gonzo or fanatic like Asscroft

  He was praised by both parties - even Schumer thinks well of him.

  Bush is taking the safe road with him

  Reply
• 0%

  Wizeone1 year ago

  Could it be that Waco and Ruby Ridge would not be household names right now if they had allowed the law to proceed in an orderly fashion? Your arguments do not take into account the behaviors of all the actors in these "dramas".

  Reply
• 0%

  UncontrollableScaldingDiarrhea1 year ago

  Oh, brother. He's got Chuck Shumer's endorsement. I've got a little barf in the back of my throat.

  I need some Alka Seltzer.

  Reply
• 0%

  evelyna1 year ago

  Bush should just appoint someone everyone will like. He needs to get over himself and acknowlege he is not capable of doing anything right and he needs guidance.

  Reply
• 0%

  nikkibabe1 year ago

  Hope he is not another Amigo from across the border with an ALIAS.

  Reply
• 0%

  wwwtackleclimatechangecouk9 months, 1 week ago

  http://www.tackleclimatechange.co.uk/

  Reply