Poll gives Hillary Clinton big lead over Giuliani »
Posted by: Aidenag 10 months, 1 week agoThe survey, conducted by the respected Pew Research Centre, is one of the largest taken during the campaign, involving 2,000 prospective voters. It placed the former first lady eight percentage points ahead of the Republican former New York mayor - by a margin of 51 per cent to 43 per cent - and showed that she is making ground among areas of the e
Read Full Story at telegraph.co.uk
Join the Discussion 
+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 63
-
-
0%
deathray10 months, 1 week ago
Astoundingly, two important polls have Giuliani leading Clinton by 2%, the Quinnipiac and Rasmussen. According to RealClearPolitics, Clinton has been trending up, and Giuliani has been trending down.
See for yourself:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/pr...
The RCP average gives Clinton a 3% lead, although individual polls have her leading by between 4 and 8 percent.
Reply
-
-
-
0%
Searchbeam10 months, 1 week ago
n2n,
Although I have strong reservations about Hillary, I take some comfort in the knowledge that Bill will have a positive effect on her if she gets elected.
I will agree with you!
I will take Hillary over Snowflake Rudy any day!
Rudy is a self-serving idiot who has a false sense of his worth, which is really nothing.
The entire community of NYFD and NYPD will tell you what this jerk did to them by not providing the uniform wireless communication system that the '93 WTC Bombing Commission had strongly recommended.
He and his buddy ex-NYC Police Commissioner Bernie Kerik have a lot of skeletons in their closets. Bernie was sued by his ex-lawyeres for 1/4 mil for non-payment of their fees. FBI is investigating him for criminal activities. bum that Snowflake Rudy recommended him for Homeland Security Chief's job!
I hope it all comes out AFTER rody gets nominated by the Republicans and NeoCon sympathisers. That will be like a Christmas in November for Hillary!
Reply
-
-
0%
eugenegerard10 months, 1 week ago
ANY democrat is a better choice than Hillary because----Hillary and the DLC backed Lieberman,
Until she felt the heat and wielded out of all out support.
She voted for the War and continued funding of it.
She voted for the Patriot Act. TWICE
She voted a NV for the Credit Card and Banking Bill which Equaled a Yes in a Republican Congress.
She voted for the REAL ID ACT.
She would renew NAFTA.
She is a Corporatist.
She is not a Democrat.
She is part of the problem.
NO MORE CLINTONS
NO MORE CLINTONS
NO MORE CLINTONS
Reply-
0%
NelsonR10 months, 1 week ago
Eugene = I will second your post. No more Clinton, No more Bush's. Allow America to progress to the next level but with George's leadership I do feel empathy for our next President.
Has most Americans used to many Chinese cheap imported products and are now mentally defective? They did elect George for another term.
Reply
-
-
0%
Raiderwall10 months, 1 week ago
Rudy probably won't even be the GOP nominee. He's already being hit by his Republican rivals. The GOP battle will be a fight over who is the real conservative, what is a real conservative, and who can beat Hillary. If they don't know who or what their nominee is about, then being anti-Hillary, or anti-Democrat won't be enough to carry the day.
To most Americans G.W. Bush is still the prototypical conservative.
Reply -
0%
aniokly10 months, 1 week ago
I bet this poll was taken before her disasterious performance at the debate the other night. Be interested in the next poll. Democrats don't want her, and that is why they are attacking her. The Leadership wants her stopped. Too bad, she is their front runner.
Reply -
0%
idonttrustdemocratsanymore10 months, 1 week ago
Hillary is not qualified to be president of the United States and for the first time, her armor was dented on Tuesday and perhaps for the first time, even democrats and Clinton-lovers that she is NOT the right candidate. On the other hand, if Hillary did win, I bet that BillClinton would make a much better first ladyt han he did a president-LOL
Reply -
0%
idonttrustdemocratsanymore10 months, 1 week ago
Hillary is not qualified to be president of the United States and for the first time, her armor was dented on Tuesday and perhaps for the first time, even democrats and Clinton-lovers that she is NOT the right candidate. On the other hand, if Hillary did win, I bet that Bill Clinton would make a much better first ladyt han he did a president-LOL
Reply -
0%
stevet010 months, 1 week ago
Hillary or Rudy, what's the difference? Well, she has a well-oiled campaign machine, and a husband who is popular with everybody but her; and he has a cellphone to take calls from his wife so he can convince people he's a 'loving husband'. Other than that, they are pretty much the same, that is, liberal Democrats. Oh, that's right, he SAYS he's a Republican. Ha! Ha!
Reply -
0%
automan90910 months, 1 week ago
They must have taken the poll at the communist party convention. Total BS
Reply -
0%
KYRed10 months, 1 week ago
The election outcome has already been decided by the Bilderbergers.
Reply -
0%
Natureboy10 months, 1 week ago
"At a debate in Philadelphia on Tuesday night, senators Barack Obama and John Edwards both questioned her original support for the Iraq war"
Edwards also voted for the Iraq war. He now says it was a mistake. Hillary does not. Several hundred thousand dead Iraqis were unavailable for comment.
Reply -
0%
DarkWizard10 months, 1 week ago
FTA:
"But we have seen a drift to the Left, particularly on government programmes and social issues, and add that to Bush's unpopularity these are hard times for Republicans.
"The results suggest Republicans haven't developed a considered view of what they are looking for in the campaign."
The ball really is in the Democrats' court. Or, if someone from another party were charismatic enough to take the offensive and make everyone follow his/her lead. The Republicans are only able to counter-attack what the Democrats are pointing out about the Bush administration and his handling of the last 7 years in office.
If you really listen to the arguments of the Republicans they are very weak in being able to propose any policies for the future. It's all about continuing what Bush has perpetuated during his 2 terms.
The media is steering the public toward clone candidates and we need to resist them. Paul, Kucinich, or Gravel would better anti-establishment candidates.
Reply-
0%
Searchbeam10 months, 1 week ago
The Dems sure know how to snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory!
Reply
-
-
0%
dmky10 months, 1 week ago
I find it hard to believe anyone would vote for Hilary Clinton, democrat or republican ...didnt the Clinton's do enough damage and hurt enough people the first time around, Vince Foster is still dead, the harm to the people at the rose law firm, putting at risk the president's secretary's pension ...let alone the marine guards and security details whose careers were potentially put on the line with the Clinton's lies and cover ups..., the Arkansas troopers having to act like an escort service, and all the women he harmed or drug thru the mud ...and not least the lying to the country and the purjury committed during the investigations... There are a lot of good hard working people in this country and we deserve to be represented by a president who loves the country as much as we do, not with the slime the Clinton's still represent.
Reply -
HanymanComment removed: User banned.
-
0%
Dave5910 months, 1 week ago
What most of the right and left wing supporters seem to fail to realize is that a more moderate stance is needed.
They continue to push the total left or right wing views. Either one of these options is probably political suicide right now.
The government has become so convoluted that I'm not sure any one person can make it work. My guess is that if the Executive and Legislative branches of our government can not clean their own houses then we as a nation are on the downhill slide to obscurity.
Much of this comes down to the choice of the voters. To put it simply, if one votes for fools then one gets foolishness.
The sad thing is if you are the best and brightest why run for office? You can make a lot more money without the BS in private industry.
So it seems that when it comes to running the country we get the left overs. And our current condition certainly shows that to be a fact.
Reply -
0%
shyanbelle10 months, 1 week ago
LMAO! Wow, All 2,000 polled? Man, the majority has spoken. Time to pack the bags and move to Mexico, I'm hoping since the government tells their countries citizens to come here, they won't mind me showing up and taking a job.
After all though "the respected pew research center's largest poll conducted" just said Hillary is our next president.
But hey, better her then some crazy like Ron Paul having a slew of net hackers/spammers crack the system and some how make him the winner.
I should have encrypted that in code so only the smart people could understand it, Pauls spammers will be here in seconds to down vote this comment.
:-( the internet - lawless... where nobodies with net supporters try and become somebody...
Reply -
0%
getreal110 months, 1 week ago
The one thing any runner should know is don't answer a question about what you are going to do till you get in the office. You discuss the status of the country as a whole and what you think will have to be straighten out. Right now there is no answer on what to do on certain matters as this administration is untrustworthy to three Quarters of the American people. The administration, we have now has made a lot of enemies out of the very ones that voted them in. People are mad and there will be some justice for the ones this administration has brought harm to. The one thing I have seen in my early life is that when you use God to steal, kill, or any evil to another human being, God gets angry. Some things go past the point of forgiveness. Why else is there a Revelations in the Bible?
Reply -
0%
getreal110 months, 1 week ago
I just wonder. When her husband was in office and the wealthy were starting to pay a little more tax if they fixed it where the rich will have to pay back taxes if the Dems get in office?
Reply -
-
0%
Searchbeam10 months, 1 week ago
getreal,
Electoral College never failed until the 2000 elections!
The corrupt manipulation of the voting process created such devastating results. I really can't fault the electoral college process.
Another interesting thing is all the statistical methods use to declare winners NEVER failed to accurately project the winners before, and never failed here, either! Unfortunately, these statistical models are based upon accurate and truthful system of voting, and they cannot take into account the perversion of the process and the malfeasance of the candidates and their thugs!
The elections of 2000 and 2004 were outright frauds!
Reply
-
-
-
-
0%
RedstateLib10 months, 1 week ago
They are terrified of Hillary. AG post a negitive story about daily. They are really afraid she can beat any of the Republicans that are running so the are working fulltime to defeat her without even knowing who thier candiadte is. They don't care who their canddate is they just want their guy to win.
Reply -
0%
dunkirk10 months, 1 week ago
1) Shes a Dem so they hate any of them by default
2) Shes a Clinton, who despite all the much they threw against Bill still managed to have one of the highest approval ratings of any President
3) Per polls she stands a good chance of beating anyone the Repuiblicans put up.
She has to be scary to them and their fantasies.
Reply-
0%
repealthe22ndbush200810 months, 1 week ago
1. Baloney. There are dozens of decent Democrats in Congress and in Governorships.
2. No, she's Hillary not Bill. THAT'S the difference.
3. She might pull a Gore and get more popular votes by running up the totals in New York and California, but she will lose in the EC -ESPECIALLY with Nader in the mix.
And she's usually wrong, but not scary. She's a patriot. What is scary is a greenhorn like Obama or a Marxist like Edwards.
Reply -
0%
Dave5910 months, 1 week ago
I can say this for sure. If Ms. Clinton didn't frighten the Republicans at least a little they wouldn't be so steadfast and staunch in their condemnation.
But something is making their little white Rush Limbaugh loving arses nervous and I don't think it's Dennis Kucinich.
Reply
-
Submitted By:
Aidenag
Photographer by day, news junkie by night. My main areas of interest are politics and the environment. If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions ...
Also submitted:
- 1.0 - Time lapse video reveals five year CERN project in 5 minutes
- 10.0 - Palin's Pastor: God "Is Gonna Strike Out His Hand Against" America
- 8.8 - Palin's Church Promotes Converting Gays
- 6.5 - Palin got help from corrupt oilman during her first run for state office
Related Articles:
Why not submit a story?
Also Propping This Article
TimALoftis
capn_caveman
MidnightPrism
charbarred
Helixbuilder
ciera-marie- eugenegerard
Eagle_Eye
DarkWizard- aframerindio
Groups Watching This
No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your group?
