Politics

Take This Survey- Do You Think Cheney and Bush Should Be…
This story has mostly positive ratings. 207 votes / 20 sinks

Take This Survey- Do You Think Cheney and Bush Should Be…

Politics – Cast your vote. If the people decided rather than congress would these men be investigated? Let's see how it turns out.

Tags: poll, impeachment, high crimes, misdemeanors

Report

Filter Comments ›
1 - 50 of 631 Comments by 88 members  RSS Feed for comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > »

Add Comment
avatar
Reply

Impeachment. If it were in the hands of the public, would these men be investigated???

What do you think? Vote and lets see the results.

avatar
Reply

...we're gonna stick the peach where???

(Voted)

avatar
Reply

It should be a large water melon. And stick it where Bush and Cheney think the sun shines from--their worthless arses.

avatar
Reply

Will the melons fit in there with their heads?

avatar
Reply

I would pay money to watch that!

avatar
Reply

hmmm, according to your other posts, it's more like you would force someone else to pay (with threats of torture or exile) so you could watch that.

avatar
Reply

MD:

LOL

avatar
Reply

How dare you ask such a question. Bush and Cheney are honest men of high repute who have sought nothing but peace and prosperity for the whole world. Do you dare rank them with such undesirables as Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton? Why, I think I gonna take that peach and show you where it belongs.

---

sarcasm mode off

avatar
Reply

pongping:

LMAO.

One question. Was that high repute or "High" Repute. As in cocaine?

Or maybe ill repute. LOL

avatar
Reply

Sometimes I get confused as you may have noticed. Perhaps, it was "ill" repute I meant.

avatar
Reply

Voted yes. Can I shoot them now?

avatar
Reply

No, no, GWW. A firing squad's too good for real traitors.

The rope's the only way to do away with this kind of evil, just like they did in the Old West. The irony shouldn't be lost on a couple of straight-shooting Texas cattle rustlers like these two.

And like Clint always said, "Hang 'em high!"

(Voted)

avatar
Reply

I take offense at people calling bush a texan.

avatar
Reply

"I take offense at people calling bush a texan."

Me too! I'm a fan of the Dixie Chicks.

He is a lying frat rat child of privilege and an ivy league cheerleading party boy. He has sullied the good reputation of cowboys everywhere. He's an embarrassment to the Lone Star State and should be an embarrassment to the rest of the country.

avatar
Reply

...didn't most of you cowboys vote for him though? I just spent 16 hours over the holiday driving through texas and all I heard on the radio was country, evangelical, part of the Texas-ASU game, the Rush program or the Glenn Beck program (subs on both these lasts) - a state generally deluded by the well funded, right wing propaganda machine.

PS: I've always liked the Chicks, regardless!

avatar
Reply

Most working cowboys in Texas are Hispanic these days, and the vast majority of them vote Dem. You are merely further sullying the reputations of Texas cowboys.

You should check your radio for malfunctions or switch it to FM. There are thousands of rock, classic rock, and classical stations in Texas. There are even a few that defy characterization, like KGSR in Austin.

Our barely esteemed governor, a definite beneficiary of the "well funded, right wing propaganda machine" managed to get elected with 39% of the vote. I wouldn't use the term "generally" when speaking of the deluded 39%. I also wouldn't use that term when speaking of the 31% of deluded Texans that still support our pseudo Texan prez.

To be sure, this is a red state, but it is also far more sophisticated and educated than your insulting diatribe implies. But since you like the Dixie Chicks, you obviously have good taste, therefore you are forgiven.

avatar
Reply

You obviously did not drive through the Lower Rio Grande Valley. This 3-county area has always been solid blue.

avatar
Reply

MonkeyBiz:

Hell, Bush is no cowboy. Bet he can't saddle his own horse.

Wouldn't know how to throw a rope. Headin' and heelin' to him probabaly means fallin on his head from drinking to much. Then he needs heelin'.

Just get a rope. Try these traitors. When found guilty give them seven days to make peace. Then hang em.

Let it be a message to all who try to corrupt this great nation for their own ill gotten gain.

Like the Dixie Chicks as well. They were the real patriots standing up for their beliefs.

avatar
Reply

Bush probably doesn't own a horse, and if he does, it's probably some fancy Kentucky race horse, not a genuine Texas quarter horse cow pony.

As for the rope and hanging them, I'd celebrate Texas style - "...Whiskey for my men, and beer for my horses..."

Dixie Chicks are HOT (and smart)! Charlie Robison is a lucky, lucky man.

avatar
Reply

Throwing in a little Willie Nelson isn't it.

avatar
Reply

He may be a long haired, pot smokin', gypsy guitar pickin', cowboy music crooner, but Willie is a true Texan through and through.

(Howya been CBG? Good to hear from ya.)

avatar
Reply

I have always loved Willies music. The song my daughters always pick for me is.

"Mama Don't Let Your Baby's Grow Up To Be Cowboy's"

They say it was made for me. Ha Ha ha ha.

I also like "Luckenbach Texas" "Angel Flying to Close to the Ground" "Whiskey River" "Blue Eyes Crying in the Rain" "An Uncloudy Day"...

Like Waylon Jennings as well God rest his soul.

"Good Hearted Woman, Lovin a Good Timing Man" "I've Always been Crazy but it Keeps me From Going Insane"

"Are you Sure Hank Done it this Way" "Lonesome Ornrey and Mean"...

I've been well. How about yourself?

Good to hear from you as well.

avatar
Reply

Hell Gramps;last I heard,LeShrub was scared of horses,why you never see him on one...

avatar
Reply

Shadowolf:

Well the picture I saw was probably faked or GW's wife is an awfully happy woman. If you get my drift. LOL

avatar
Reply

I agree wholeheartedly.

avatar
Reply

GhostWhoWalks

Threatening a President is illegal, and can cause the Secret Service to visit you. Think before you speak!!

avatar
Reply

Codi6934:

I'm quite sure GWW is not threatening our sitting president.

Our sitting president is threatening us though. With his lack of any concept of decency. Bush has caused he death of many. How many soldiers must die or be horribly mutilated before you see the evil he does? How many Iraqi's must suffer for the greed of the Bushies and their folly?

Do we now go to war in Iran to prove the complete insanity of this liars ways?

Try him as the war criminal he is, along with Cheney.

That is what is wrong with this country now. We allow the criminals in office to make the laws they break. Then bypass them for the greed of corporate America.

But of course there are the Bushie faithful who are to ignorant to see the truth. To ignorant orjust to plain greedy to care about right or wrong.

avatar
Reply

Voted yes. Can I shoot them now?

That's sound like a threat to me. Wait until the Secret Service gets ahold of it. I am sure they will feel the same.

Besides when did liberals ever care about U.S. soldiers!

avatar
Reply

Codi6934:

I knew many "liberals" in Nam who cared very much about their friends and fellow soldiers.

Do you call these fellow former warriors uncaring about soldiers?

Do you think all soldiers are Republicans or what?

As far as GWW's joke. That what I took it as. If you have read some of his other posts you would see that.

avatar
Reply

codi, just like aquestion that asked if Petraeus is betraying us... you make an opposite out of a negative or at best just a question! Are you a scared whimpering person by nature... to be so scared by the bushies, to accept their deceptions, to reinterpret negatively like you have?

avatar
Reply

Codi6934: "Besides when did liberals ever care about U.S. soldiers!"

Always.

Liberals care about fellow human beings. U.S. soldiers are fellow human beings. ==> Liberals care about U.S. soldiers.

They also care about Iraqis, because they are fellow human beings as well.

avatar
Reply

...unborn babies, that's a whole different banana.

Am I catching on, Candida?

avatar
Reply

I'm for contraception, not abortion, but I don't consider embryos babies. I'm definitely against late term abortions unless they are absolutely necessary to save the mother.

How many unwanted babies have you adopted? It's easy to talk when there are no stakes involved.

avatar
Reply

How many unwanted babies have you adopted?

I like it when that question is always asked as rebuttal. I guess the rebuttal to the rebuttal would go like, so how many have you adopted as you make the same claim of others.

You see once most people decides to have their own children, they usually get off the contraception's they are taking to do so get pregnant then get back on them. Then after they have their own children, they usually don't have money left over to go adopt a child that some one else had because they didn't take the necessary steps to not become pregnant in the first place. You see, contraception can be obtained, even if you just spend the dollar at the local gas station and get a condom in the restroom or the free clinic, if you can't afford the dollar stuff. If people would take that step there would be less chance that abortion would even be an issue.

avatar
Reply

I have adopted no unwanted babies, but I don't but into other people's private lives either. Do I wish they would use contraception? Yes, I do. Some people are just stupid, but the education system could help.

avatar
Reply

Where was the outrage in the the 90's? U.S. soldiers died on BS feel good missions that had nothing to do with national security. And nothing was said! What changed?

avatar
Reply

Codi6934: "What changed?"

1. More die now.

2. This was was illegal and unnecessary.

avatar
Reply

And Clinton got Congress approval for all his feel good missions? And lied when he said troops would out of Bosnia in one year?

So it is ok if we die,only in small numbers to ease your mind!!

avatar
Reply

No, I just answered the question: What's changed. I'm against all wars. Even one death is too many.

avatar
Reply

Then were where you in the 90's?

avatar
Reply

I was against wars in the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s, 00s, and probably will be in the 10s, 20s... as long as I live.

avatar
Reply

Why didn't you b*tch this loud with Clinton?

avatar
Reply

I'm not a Democrat. I'm just a small l liberal. I'm quite willing to bitch against anything I disagree with.

Do you want me to condemn the regular bombing of Iraq in the 90s? How about the spinelessness of the Democrats in voting for war? Done.

avatar
Reply

"Besides when did liberals ever care about U.S. soldiers!"

Our national cemeteries contain the bodies of more Democrat (liberal) patriots than Repugs. In Vietnam, I knew only one conservative among about 30 men. Historically, the rich man's party Repugs have avoided service, while the sons of the working class Dems have gone to war. Look at the current administration, how many are veterans that have been to war? Zilch. Nada. You apparently are a brainwashed bushbot, or a limpjaw dildo-head.

I find your statement very offensive. It implies that I never cared for my fellow soldiers and that they never cared for me. In a previous age, you would have to defend yourself in a duel after I slapped half your face off. How do you think you would fare against a ******ed off and greatly insulted combat veteran?

avatar
Reply

I was a U.S. Marine after Vietnam and there wasn't a liberal in my unit. We knew that in the name of helping us, they kept taking away our weapons and ability to fight.

We were particularly p***ed when Bill Clinton became the first president to order his Marine guards to double as waiters at his fund-raising parties. Very denegrating and very disrespectful of our tradition and uniform.

avatar
Reply

Spinward:

Don't blame you for hating to be a waiter at fund raising parties.

I hated being a shill for the lies being perpetrated on the American public about 'Nam. I still remember coming home and hearing we weren't in Cambodia. I was asking my self where was I in May of '70. Oh yeah thats right Cambodia.

So forgive me when I say people died where I was, how many died being a waiter for Clinton. I don't think it's right that they had you do it. But what a difference.

Yeah I cared about my fellow soldiers still do. I'm a moderate centrist. Probably a liberal to you. You know though that really doesn't matter when the sh*t hits the fan. All you really care about is coming home and taking care of your partners. Get the job done, kill them and get out with no casualties. That was our hope anyway.

avatar
Reply

And what party were you being a shill for back in 1970?

avatar
Reply

slate:

Both parties. It is still both parties. It will continue to be both parties. As long as there are politicians on both sides of the spectrum who profit from blood money.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > »

Add Comment

You must log in first to post a comment. Secure Signin

Not a member? Sign-up today!


Who voted on this story?

View all (198) »

Who sunk this story?