Got feedback on the new design? We're Listening! Send us Feedback

G.O.P. Voters, in Big Shift, Favor McCain Over His Rivals »

Posted by: TechnologyExpert 7 months, 4 weeks ago

95 Comments Report this Story

9.2

Scale of 1 to 10

Read: 49

Propped: 96

Comments: 95

Click Prop It to Raise Score
Prop it

Republican voters have sharply altered their views of the party's presidential candidates following the early contests in Iowa and New Hampshire, with Senator John McCain, once widely written off, now viewed more favorably than any of his major competitors, according to the latest nationwide New York Times/CBS News Poll.

Read Full Story at nytimes.com

Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 95
  • 0%
    aniokly7 months, 4 weeks ago

    McCain won one primary. So did Huckabee, and soon Romney will win Michigan. It means nothing. The Primary election season will not be over for months. It is way too early to call a winner in either party.

    Reply

    20 Replies

    • 0%
      earthlingerer7 months, 3 weeks ago

      Aww, come on, credit where it's due!

      Romney's relatives did give him some vote in Wyoming.

      America doesn't want Romney, we want normal people for leaders, not someone who confers with blasphemous "apostles."

      Reply

      7 Replies

    • 0%
      DropkickaLib7 months, 3 weeks ago

      Actually, some of the early states let you vote in any primary you want, regardless of your party affiliation. So in some states, the Democrats get to choose their candidate and the Republican candidate.

      Reply

      11 Replies

  • 0%
    Charlson7 months, 3 weeks ago

    Well, the bootlicker has new life. Now go suck up to the christian right evangelists in South Carolina.

    Reply

    1 Reply

    • 0%
      vor7 months, 3 weeks ago

      The neocon bootlicker that is...all this country needs is another 4 years of those goons controlling our foreign policy. The only issue that he parts ways with them is on torture. So he is a humane warmonger!

      Same goes for Guiliani and even Huckabee who has been consulting the likes of John Bolton on foreign policy.

      If we are ever going to have serious allies again, neo-conservative idealogy must leave the White House.

      Reply
    • 0%
      joeblowe7 months, 3 weeks ago

      Yet another damned journalist writing paragraph after paragraph about what might happen when people find out how OTHER people voted. Jesus Henrietta Christ - why can't the media made a presumption in favor of people making up their OWN minds and present FACTS about the various candidates instead of making up endless "what-ifs" about future voting results. It continues to make me sick.

      I think the only way to really solve this is to have ALL the primaries on the same day. Sort of like the actual elections. Then people will HAVE to make up their own minds, and MAYBE the IDIOT media will be forced to give us something halfway useful so they can fill up the dead air that would be left due to not being able to endlessly speculate about previous and/or future results.

      Reply
      • 0%
        Centinel7 months, 3 weeks ago

        All I want to say here is a quote from Ben Franklin with respect to McCain's platform.

        A people who would sacrifice liberty for a little bit of insufficient security, deserve neither.

        Or something to that effect.

        Reply

        2 Replies

        • 0%
          StarLord7 months, 3 weeks ago

          "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin.

          Also, I quite like this - it's distinctly apropos of late:

          "All wars are follies, very expensive and very mischievous ones." - Benjamin Franklin.

          Reply

          1 Reply

      • 0%
        THOMNH627 months, 3 weeks ago

        and people who will do and say anything to get a vote are any better, ie Hillary

        Reply
        • 0%
          Centinel7 months, 3 weeks ago

          The only candidate that has all the interests of the nation on their platform and has actually provided solutions that would work is Ron Paul. The funny thing is that most of the solutions are economically founded. I think he realizes that if you follow the money, you will find the cause of most of our problems.

          Reply

          32 Replies

          • 0%
            DropkickaLib7 months, 3 weeks ago

            The return to the Gold Standard is sheer madness. Ron Paul reminds me of William Jennings Bryan and his "Free Silver" campaign.

            Reply

            27 Replies

          • 0%
            wtagg7 months, 3 weeks ago

            I find it ironic that the alleged conservatives are against the most conservative candidate.

            Paul is certainly not a perfect candidate, but he does seem to grasp that the country cannot burn through $10,000,000,000 to $15,000,000,000 a month and not see any equity from the expenditure. He also seems to understand that the sacrifice of our troops is not creating security or anything else for this country.

            The fastest way to security is to stop paying for a commodity to those that we are in conflict with. We are financing the war on both sides. That is madness.

            $10,000,000,000 to $15,000,000,000 a month would go a long way to developing other technologies. It would also help to put our country in a leadership role in the arena and provide us a commodity for us to export.

            Reply
            • 0%
              ABANOCLA7 months, 3 weeks ago

              If Ron Paul could get some MSM attention, he would get a lot more interest in his campaign. But forget the MSM ever letting that happen.

              Reply

              2 Replies

          • 0%
            tbkennedy537 months, 3 weeks ago

            Of course the NY Times wants McCain. Except for Iraq he's a Democrat and Ted's buddy.

            Reply

            1 Reply

          • 0%
            NelsonR7 months, 3 weeks ago

            The Republicans deserve to lose with a party taken over by the Evangelical crowd of religious war mongers. How can you separate Bin Ladens crowd and the Evangelical Republican crowd, you can't. Both believe force by arms with a God on their side is righteous. McCain is an avowed nationalist war hawk but he isn't religious but when you also factor in his wish for amnesty for illegals he has two huge strikes against him, hopefully he will not be elected as all misery and war loving Republicans.

            Reply

            2 Replies

            • 0%
              Centinel7 months, 3 weeks ago

              The best thing the democrats could get would be McCain running on the republican ticket. It would cause a virtual shoe in for whoever is the democratic candidate. Remember, Bob Dole did the impossible; He got Clinton re-elected.

              Reply

              1 Reply

          • 0%
            gamahuche7 months, 3 weeks ago

            The Cons remind me of impatient fishermen, casting desperately, getting little bites, nothing to hook onto at all, cast again..

            Isn't the simple truth that NONE of them are up to snuff and they know the populace couldn't care less whether they elect little Red Riding Hood or the Big Big Bad Wolf so long as s/he is NOT a Republican.

            [except for Alpha who is still desperately casting around for ANYBODY on the Con flank who could maybe, maybe say SOMETHING that would stop people yawning.]

            Too much to hope that they might actually couch their campaign in positives!

            Reply

            8 Replies

            • 0%
              DropkickaLib7 months, 3 weeks ago

              As opposed to that fountain of positive energy, Hitlery Clinton!

              Reply

              2 Replies

            • 0%
              pongping7 months, 3 weeks ago

              I can't really disagree with you about the Cons. However, I would like to ask who on the other side is up to snuff? Hillary supports Iraq, or does she sometimes not support it? She's an Lieberman-AIPAC puppet on Iran. What's she going to do about the massive debt we have, the strapping payments on interest alone, and the overspending that is the cause? How is she going to bring home the bacon that has gone overseas? She keeps talking about all this great experience, but what executive experience does she have, other than living with Bill in the White House? Tell me how she is going to unite the country. I can't see it. She is divisive because she gives off the persona that she is always right, and only she is right. She worries me because I see nothing other than talk which ostensibly she is good at.

              Reply

              4 Replies

          • 0%
            pongping7 months, 3 weeks ago

            The deal for McCain started back in 2000 when he agreed to let them trash him promising him the nomination in 2008. Thus we have "bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran", an absolutely irresponsible ploy by a so-called presidential candidate.

            Reply

            1 Reply

            • 0%
              vor7 months, 3 weeks ago

              How can one not look a bit crooked at a man who honorably served his country, suffered through horrible conditions as a POW but then allows himself to be mauled by his own party. You have to respect his service but you don't have to respect the decisions he has made since.

              I can see the slogan now:

              Elect McCain in '08, he's the new Bob Dole!

              "We couldn't find a real candidate so we settled for the oldest guy."

              Reply
            • 0%
              pongping7 months, 3 weeks ago

              Hey, I like that better, "ponAping". I could ask the same question about Obama and whether or not he possesses real, brass-tacks leadership experience, and the ability to tell the lobbyists to go to Hades because the people's interest are at stake. He, however, does offer something that Hillary does not seem to possess, his own thoughts which are not stuck in some Twilight Zone from 35 years ago. I presume that is the true hope he is talking about.

              Reply

              3 Replies

              • 0%
                DropkickaLib7 months, 3 weeks ago

                No experience is good experience in some ways. No one can critize you for decisions you've never had to make before.

                Reply

                2 Replies

            • 0%
              Mintyfunk7 months, 3 weeks ago

              I wonder if these are the same pollster who predicted double digit victory in New Hampshire for Obama. McCain has done well because of open primaries and Independent voters. Voters who made vote Dem come election time.

              Reply
              • 0%
                motivator9117 months, 3 weeks ago

                as a Independent and as a Marine Corps veteran who has religiously followed not only United states politics but world events. McCain is the only candidate with not only the exsperience but the integrity to become the next president, as is apparent by his 20 plus years between the house and senate as well as the various commitees he has served on the most important being on the foriegn relations commitee and as sad as it is to say, apparently the only mature candidate as is obvious by the actions of the rest, in thier adds and debates by the way they childishly complain about the others record instead of presenting thier own or should I say lack of thier own

                Reply
                • 0%
                  rayganye7 months, 3 weeks ago

                  If McCain is elected president he will surprise everyone. If you think that Clinton gave you something to remember and Bush gave you something to remember, well McCain will give the world something to remember for a 1000 years. I can't tell you what his big surprise will be because you won't vote for him and we don't want a cry baby in the white house. . . . The "big bang" theory, McCain president and Rudy Vice-president - let us show the world how tough we really can be. I Think that Al Gore should be our next president - Rayganye.

                  Reply
                  • 0%
                    simonsez7 months, 3 weeks ago

                    I don't think we can predict the electability of anyone at this point.

                    I could only support McCain if he were running against Hillary.

                    Reply

                    1 Reply

                    • 0%
                      saintetienne7 months, 3 weeks ago

                      "I could only support McCain if he were running against Hillary."

                      Well, THAT'S easy. I could support ANYONE running against Hillary. A paper boy....An oil sludge collector.....A street mime.....A fry cook.....A Los Angeles Unified School teacher....

                      Yes, recent polls indicate that when it comes to Shrillary, nearly 88% of the population is more qualified to lead our nation than the aging, scandal-ridden, cackling crone that is Hillary Clinton - - ex-first lady and tossed-aside wife extraordinaire!

                      Reply
                    • 0%
                      nikkibabe7 months, 3 weeks ago

                      These neo con dumb****** want 100 years more of Iraqi occupation (wonder who pays for it), invade and occupy Iran, threaten Syria.

                      The US foreign policy will be restricted only to invade and occupy as many countries as possible.

                      Reply

                      1 Reply

                      • 0%
                        abntv7 months, 3 weeks ago

                        Have another glass of wine

                        Reply
                      • 0%
                        simonsez7 months, 3 weeks ago

                        I did mean monetary ... thanks, drop.

                        Reply
                        • 0%
                          aniokly7 months, 3 weeks ago

                          In the states where Democrats can vote Republican, Republicans can vote Democrat. There are 11 crossover states. It works both ways. Republicans can help Democrats get the candidate they want to run against.

                          Reply
                          • 0%
                            pongping7 months, 3 weeks ago

                            So that means you didn't read his post before responding and putting words in his mouth that he didn't say to the effect that he was in favor of a violent revolution. Did you even read mine? Oh, don't bother answering.

                            Reply
                            • 0%
                              kedirian7 months, 2 weeks ago

                              A President McCain may not even make it past his inaugural parade - so, America, THINK who his running-mate is/will be!

                              Reply
                              Next 25 comments

                              You must be signed in to post a comment. Sign in »

                              Submitted By:
                              TechnologyExpert

                              I am Editor-in-Chief at Alice Hill's RealTechNews (http://www.realtechnews.com). I also have my own blog (Tech-Ex) at http://TechnologyExpert.Blogspot.com. Finally ...

                              Also submitted:

                              Related Articles:

                              Why not submit a story?

                              Also Propping This Article

                              view all »

                              Groups Watching This

                              No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your group?

                              Advertisement