Continuing Improvements. Tell Us How We’re Driving! Send us Feedback

Clinton's top strategist quits »

Posted By cmetzger4 6 months, 1 week ago in News
5.3

Scale of 1 to 10

Read: 59

Propped: 34

Comments: 7

Click Prop It to Raise Score
Prop it

The chief strategist for Sen. Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign is quitting that post amid criticism of his public relations firm's contacts with the Colombian government over a pending free-trade deal, Clinton's campaign announced.

Read Full Story at cnn.com »

7 Comments Report

Submitted By:
cmetzger4

A few weeks ago, I woke up to find myself married to a beautiful woman and the father of two young girls. With no memory ...

Also submitted:

Related Articles:

Why not submit a story?

Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 7
  • 0%
    nikkibabe6 months, 1 week ago

    A lobbyist "liar" leaves a pathological "liar"campaign. No surprise here.

    Reply
    • 0%
      ETproductions6 months, 1 week ago

      Wow! That's big news. Personally, I think Mark Penn should have gone months ago, or better still should never have been part of her staff. He was the architect of much of the negative Tanya Harding strategy that has driven the former First Lady's negatives so high among Democrats.

      But this news goes to a more serious question. It shows the "Ready on Day One" argument to be false on yet another important front.

      Since Hillary has made a mess of running a campaign, how can she expect to run a country? Being a great executive means you know how to manage things effectively. A campaign is a thing to manage. So to compare Hillary's executive expertise with that of Obama, we have only to look at the results each has achieved in the primaries.

      Reply

      4 Replies

      • 0%
        ETproductions6 months, 1 week ago

        Hillary started as the heir apparent to the Bush/Clinton dynasty. She assumed that she had little to do to gain the nomination. She ignored Obama, even though his stellar speech at the 2004 Convention should have warned her he was a force to be reckoned with. In this, she demonstrated very poor judgment.

        When the contest got underway, she failed to develop a grassroots organization to get out the vote in Iowa. The result was that both Obama and Edwards trounced her.

        The same is true of Super Tuesday. Obama won 2 states to Hillary's 1. He was better organized. This is astounding considering that Obama is an upstart, and Hillary is plugged in to the powerful Clinton machine of influence peddling and ward healer politics. Organizing is an executive skill. Obama has that skill, and Hillary doesn't.

        After the Super Tuesday drubbing, her campaign again demonstrated disastrous judgment with the racially charged remarks Bill used to try to spin the losses in the South.

        Reply

        3 Replies

    • 0%
      ETproductions6 months, 1 week ago

      Reported as spam.

      Reply
      Next 25 comments

      Add a Comment

      Forgot your password?

      Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

      To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

      Got a Story?

      Story Tags ?

      Groups Watching This

      No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your group?

      Also Submitted By

      No one else has submitted this story.

      Advertisement