Busted, Yet FoxNews Continues Pentagon's Covert Propaganda »
Posted By DiffeeOnline 5 months, 1 week ago in NewsOn Sunday, a week after the Times story broke, Fox was still airing -- without disclosure -- exposed pundit Thomas McInerney. Last Wednesday, they aired another pundit, Robert H. Scales. See them for yourself:
Read Full Story at huffingtonpost.com »
Submitted By:
DiffeeOnline
Social media, politics, technology, news, marketing, and the environment. These are my passions. These are the things that I spend more time with than anything ...
Also submitted:
Related Articles:
Why not submit a story?
Join the Discussion 
+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 168
-
0%
hyperbola5 months, 1 week ago
The same old lies are being spread all over again by these traitors. Imagine selling your country out for cash.
The neoconning of a nation
Do No Evil â;; The Pentagon has duped Americans by organizing a bunch of retired U.S. generals -- mislabelled "independent military experts" -- to shill for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Watch these rent-a-generals again prostitute themselves on TV by promoting the administration's party line about the great Syrian nuclear menace.
http://donoevil.propeller.com/story/2008/04/28/...
Reply-
0%
Teech5 months, 1 week ago
As far as a turd of an opinion piece (below), that goes for the entire FOX news network. Lies interspersed with opinion laced with Bush admin. propaganda.
BANO - Spanish for toilet - Bush Admin. News Organization.
..."The same old lies are being spread all over again by these traitors. Imagine selling your country out for cash...The neoconning of a nation..."
Yup, just imagine. And they continue to fleece America for billions with that profit-making smirk on their faces. But don't you understand that to these Cons, selling your country and slaughtering our kids for cash is patriotic! Disagreeing with it is being a traitor.
Reply -
0%
injest5 months, 1 week ago
"The New York Times publishes an exposé on the hidden ties between media military analysts and the Pentagon that most likely violate federal "covert propaganda" laws."
Is this the 3rd or 4th version of this NON-Story?
"covert propaganda" laws? That's a new one on me. However I think when one of these retired Gen. says something like "My sources at the Pentagon tell me"
Kinda sorta blows any "covert" claim out of the water ya think?
IMO for "covert propaganda", would be true IF these Gen were not ID as retired military, just some Joe Sixpact man on the street and/or they had no connection to the military what so ever.
Short of that what idiot doesn't know or think that Military officers would be giving their opinion on military matters based on their military experience?
Reply-
0%
hyperbola5 months, 1 week ago
Well injest, it has long been clear that you are an israel-firster who doesn't know much about America or American democracy. Government propaganda directed at Americans has been banned under our law for almost a century. The direct instruction of "retired" generals by the Pentagon in what to say certainly qualifies as lawbreaking.
Reply
-
-
-
0%
DropkickaLib5 months, 1 week ago
This is the usual baseless partisan hack job from H.R. Huffinpuff. Yeah, the last thing you want in a military affairs pundit is someone connected to the military. Sink this turd of an opinion piece.
Reply-
-
0%
crespi5 months, 1 week ago
We still have 17 years of name calling Neocons remaining, to be even for the hate lies and the screaming of "libtard," coward, etc. we have had to endure.
I, personally did not like being called a traitor by Conservatives when I tried to discuss global warming, REPEATEDLY, right here on propeller.
Also citizen midleft is not inaccurate in the assessment.
Mid is commenting to an as*hole named "DropkickaLib" who has BUILT-IN NAME CALLING right in the avatar name.
Until THAT ENDS midleft is only being fair.
Reply -
0%
TGrass30015 months, 1 week ago
I think that should be "DropkickaLib AND midlett, is the name calling really necessary?" It starts with name calling because it's an easy distraction. If you disagree with this comment, HEY look over there a shiny object.
Reply -
0%
dunkirk5 months, 1 week ago
Ummmm if u look at the names of hte rabid right they seem to have that built in, and htey wonder why when they call for libs ot be banned for name calling it goes no further then the ewaste basket. They are the biggest bunch of whiners and crybabies that exist on th eplanet who feel they and htey alone can determine who to name call and when its fiar play to do so. They have NO leg to stand on when they cry about being called names. Its almost as good as Alpha in the LumDaDork persona saying she never called people names, yet when caught doing it, it was because THEY made her do it.
Reply
-
-
0%
quackpot5 months, 1 week ago
Drop, do you also want paid representatives of drug companies providing health advice on T.V. medical interviews?
Reply
-
