This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
Papa how many times do we need to count those votes? Ot's been ten years and the numbers still say Bush won,,,,, I'm sorry that you guys still can't get over the fact that the tree in a suit lost an election,,,,, it's ok he's found another pet project so you guys can worship him,,,, I can't figure out why you would, but hey....
10 years - closer to 8. But I was bringing that up because you brought up the 1992 election - that's 16 years ago. And you complain about me bringing up an even from 8 years ago.
On the recounts, it all depends on how you recount. If you count all the Democratic absentee ballots that were destroyed, Gore wins. If you discount all the Republican absentee ballots that the Republican Secretary of State allowed the same mistakes to be corrected for which the Democratic ballots were trashed, Gore wins. If you believe a number of independent recounts, both Gore & Bush win. If you count the votes for Gore that 1 election official saw being DEDUCTED from Gore's total, then Gore wins.
You tell me to get over W's VERY questionable win from 2000, but you can't get over Clinton's Indisputable victory ov '92.
And as to his '04 victory, there are STILL many outstanding election-tampering & -suppression allegations out there. That's still in question, too.
I never said Clinton lied or cheated to win, you guys did (with Bush). heck even if I thought Clinton cheated, after about the 4th recount I would have been smart enough to figure out I was mistaken and let it go,, yeah 8 (almost 10 years),,, I missed it ny 2 which if 5 better than the way Obama counts states.
You tell me to get over W's VERY questionable win from 2000, but you can't get over Clinton's Indisputable victory ov '92,,, the whole point was that you said Bush didn't have a majoritym and I proved you wrong,,,,, I also pointed out that Clinton won with less than a Majority,,,,
Hate to break it to you. W won WITHOUT winning the popular vote in 2000. He only won the electoral college vote with the interference by the Supreme Court.
It's funny that States' Rights advocates went to the US Supreme Court to interfere & hinder a state's own laws with regards to recounts.
More hypocrisy.
And read my notes on the various recounts. Gore would've won under most circumstances, Bush won under just 1 or 2 - the most important of which was the interference by the SCOTUS. How dare it stop the recount for a week then say the recount can't continue because it can't be completed in the alloted time - which it WOULD have been if the SCOTUS wouldn't have stopped it in the first place.
POPULAR I think he did the last time?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_...
Papa how many times do we need to count those votes? Ot's been ten years and the numbers still say Bush won,,,,, I'm sorry that you guys still can't get over the fact that the tree in a suit lost an election,,,,, it's ok he's found another pet project so you guys can worship him,,,, I can't figure out why you would, but hey....
10 years - closer to 8. But I was bringing that up because you brought up the 1992 election - that's 16 years ago. And you complain about me bringing up an even from 8 years ago.
On the recounts, it all depends on how you recount. If you count all the Democratic absentee ballots that were destroyed, Gore wins. If you discount all the Republican absentee ballots that the Republican Secretary of State allowed the same mistakes to be corrected for which the Democratic ballots were trashed, Gore wins. If you believe a number of independent recounts, both Gore & Bush win. If you count the votes for Gore that 1 election official saw being DEDUCTED from Gore's total, then Gore wins.
You tell me to get over W's VERY questionable win from 2000, but you can't get over Clinton's Indisputable victory ov '92.
And as to his '04 victory, there are STILL many outstanding election-tampering & -suppression allegations out there. That's still in question, too.
I never said Clinton lied or cheated to win, you guys did (with Bush). heck even if I thought Clinton cheated, after about the 4th recount I would have been smart enough to figure out I was mistaken and let it go,, yeah 8 (almost 10 years),,, I missed it ny 2 which if 5 better than the way Obama counts states.
You tell me to get over W's VERY questionable win from 2000, but you can't get over Clinton's Indisputable victory ov '92,,, the whole point was that you said Bush didn't have a majoritym and I proved you wrong,,,,, I also pointed out that Clinton won with less than a Majority,,,,
Hate to break it to you. W won WITHOUT winning the popular vote in 2000. He only won the electoral college vote with the interference by the Supreme Court.
It's funny that States' Rights advocates went to the US Supreme Court to interfere & hinder a state's own laws with regards to recounts.
More hypocrisy.
And read my notes on the various recounts. Gore would've won under most circumstances, Bush won under just 1 or 2 - the most important of which was the interference by the SCOTUS. How dare it stop the recount for a week then say the recount can't continue because it can't be completed in the alloted time - which it WOULD have been if the SCOTUS wouldn't have stopped it in the first place.