186)This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
Not a member? Sign-up today!
About Propeller | Frequently Asked Questions | Help
© 2003-2008 Propeller. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Why don't you buy the Nazi sympathizer thing when you know there's so much data about it? Doing any bit of research on prescott shows his thirst for money and power.
What makes you think that this internationally elite, legacy family doesn't have a world view that's handed down between generations?
A world view that involves contempt for the little guy, make a buck off war (Bush Sr and Carlil) and suffering, in business with shady characters (Bush Sr watching 911 with a Bin Ladin)
Because it doesn't matter. The war was over 60 some years ago. Let's learn from the past, but focus on the future and live in the present.
I think it matters. The way family works is things are handed down, values and the like. [confer Barbara Bush's post Katerina astrodome 'sympathies']
so while it matters, and while 'the father's eat the sour grapes and their children's teeth are set on edge' [a honey of a bible quote is ever there was one, meaning the actions and character of the father, the 'sins' as you [and other bible quotes] put it, are visited from generation to generation-justice and innocence have little to do with it, it is unfortunately how existence works.
you can give Prescott the benefit of the doubt and say he was just lookin to make a buck and didn't care how,but surely you can see where such an attitude has been handed down thru the family?
you are right: if we want to use the higher standard of human justice and not natural laws and rhythms inherent in existence, we should forget Bush family history and let every man, as the rest of the 'grapes' quote says, 'die for his own sin'
It's only Wright...
I'm not saying that family character doesn't matter, I'm saying that whether or not Prescott Bush was a "NAZI" sympathizer is irrelevant to the current President. He may be a money grubbing, no account sleazeball like his grand-dad or he could be a basically (as far as I can tell) decent man like his father. I know which side I'd err on, but we must judge each person on their own merits (or in this case lack thereof) and not on the merits of their associations.
As you say, it's only Wright.
glad you caught that...
:-)
about Bush Sr, I actually just saw a PBS docu where people claimed he was very much into dialogue and was in the habit of developing personal relationships via phone with world leaders
imagine that
I didn't like his politics, but I respected (respect) the man.
Any Republican in that day and age who would stand up, after pledging to not raise taxes KNOWING that it was a political liability, but still the right thing for the country, gets my respect.