112)This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
Not a member? Sign-up today!
About Propeller | Frequently Asked Questions | Help
© 2003-2008 Propeller. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
"You don't want to see nuance where it does exist. I stand behind everything I stated."
Ahh .. .don't get yourself in a lather over the dog's elitist BS. He likes to pretend he's superior when he really has no idea what he's talking about.
I've had the goof lie saying he's published peer-reviewed research, but he doesn't even have a graduate degree and can't interpret actual research papers. I've also had him try to tell me sampling in relation to polling involves math, which it does not.
Fact is, the dog is quite an a$$ and proves it often. Pathetic.
LOL. Is that so? I'm pretty sure I already explained I had earned a master's degree concurrently with my bachelor's.
But since you seem to be begging for proof, then why don't you explain to everyone these:
1) How do the intramolecular properties of haloalkane substituent groups direct the regioselectivity of indium-mediated arylation insertions?
2) Under what reaction conditions are 2-plus-2 cylcoadditions favored and disfavored, and how do recent advances in ruthenium-mediated olefin metathesis catalysts circumvent these limitations?
3) Here, I'll even throw you an easy one. Use Shrodinger's equation to explain the UV fluoresence of conjugated and aromatic systems as opposed to saturated or isolated-unsaturated hydrocarbons.
Go ahead. I'll wait for your response, although something tells me I shouldn't hold my breath. No one's impressed with your Safety-School Paparazzi degree.
LOL.
Class dismissed.