17)This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
Not a member? Sign-up today!
MacR
HOUSEMD
birddog54
bugluver
mcarpentry
tanglang
NoSpinDave
CactusAnnie
canadianrancher57
cowboygrandpa
ranchhand
Wolfie2007
RedRiverJ
About Propeller | Frequently Asked Questions | Help
© 2003-2008 Propeller. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Ohhhh Yes, I've heard of stuff like this before at the state level. Means any changes you make to your home or lawn might not be as easy as you thought. Lots of set-back issues, water runoff and other matters suddenly become a royal pain in the hind end as well as adding to the cost of improvements.
Seems the government thinks they can run our lives, take care of our property, tell us how to raise our kids better than we can.......??? I made my calls, sent my fax, I like my pond just like it is and plan to keep it.
Ditto...I sent my email
This one almost slipped by me. Just emailed my congressmen, thanks for the update, and making it so easy to find my voice in Washington, Red.
This is another prime example of an ominous attempt to weaken the rights of private property ownership.
Something is necesary to rebut the 109th (Do Nothing) Repug Congress law that said only running water need have governmental controls... you fools go ahead and such up Red's lies... like the Medical Prescription Bill which still says our seniors can't negotiate lower prices. What a bunch of repug lies and exagerations - don't fall for it.
8 years of Dumya and the former Repug Congress has seen more polluted water in the US when we should have seen cleaner!
CactusAnnie's comment ---'This is another prime example of an ominous attempt to weaken the rights of property ownership' is on the mark.