Politics

Fox News' Criminal Pundits
This story has mostly positive ratings. 68 votes / 9 sinks

Fox News' Criminal Pundits

Politics – if Fox News truly believed in guilt-by-association, the network would have severed ties with some of its pundits and consultants.

Tags: fox news, media, pundits

Report

Filter Comments ›
1 - 21 of 21 Comments by 7 members  RSS Feed for comments

1

Add Comment
avatar
Reply

S.U.N.K.

avatar
Reply

I only just saw this headline and I dont have time to read the story but I hope poppy aint talkin bout some of my FAVORITE commenters on FOX.

Sure, G. Gordon LIddy is an indicted criminal ... but it was a crime against America ... oh wait ... that cant be good.

And Oliver North ... hes a REAL American heero. He took the hit for Ronnie Reagan ... when they were tradin hostages for arms ... to send to the Right Wing Terrorists in Nicaragua. ... oh wait ... that was a real crime, wasn't it?

Well, I personally liek that fella they got who useta be an adviser to Clinton. Whats his name? Morse? Morrison? Anyhoo ... we was caught with high priced prostitutes liek the Governor of NY!!

But PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE ... I hope poppy aint talkin bout Newt Gingrich ... the guy who left his wife for a younger woman ... and TOLD her about it when she was in the hospital with cancer! ... Or who was LEADIN THE CHARGE against Clinton ... while screwin his mistress!!

avatar
Reply

Thanks for SINKIN this story KVille! WE GOT to keep a lid on truth - else it get out to the masses!!

But you know what?

Maybe its a prerequisite that you be a liar, hypocrite, or criminal to be hired by FOX.

Hmmm.

Makes sense.

avatar
Reply

Cheap shot article.

avatar
Reply

..just your style Oscar!

avatar
Reply

like the entire attack on Obama`s church, but that hasn`t slowed down the right-wing.

If common decency cannot allow them to control their juvenile behavior and attacks, bout time they got some of their own medicine.

avatar
Reply

So, ******, which "wing" do you think is justified in making this sort of attack?

avatar
Reply

Trash article. Cheap shots, little substance.

avatar
Reply

Its only a "cheap shot" because you don't like it.

If the article was a neocon discussing the "guilt by association" of 'liberals', you would be singing its praises regardless of whether or not it was factual.

Unless you can dispute any of the information in the article about Rove, Fuhrman, Liddy, North, Kristol, and/or the rest, then your complaints are empty.

avatar
Reply

You know better than that, you dishonest little creep. I have criticized this sort of attack coming from both sides.

avatar
Reply

I don't read EVERY story, nor do I read every COMMENT on every story, so I don't know that you have criticized both sides for similar issues/behavior. But you have informed me that you have done so.

That's no excuse for calling me a "dishonest little creep".

avatar
Reply

I am dedicated to accurate use of descriptive terms. I need no "excuse" for that accuracy.

avatar
Reply

R.E.S.U.N.K.

avatar
Reply

And I think a wipe and flush are in order also.

avatar
Reply

For you, maybe ...

avatar
Reply

flush twice, Crawford is a long way away.

avatar
Reply

Did you see the CSPAN broadcast last year of Roger Ailes, the Fox News Director, accepting that lifetime news award? I've never heard such a bigotted man's speech - hard to believe he's not been fired and just digging trenches somewhere where he belongs!

avatar
Reply

Do some research on Murdock, his background. Roger Ailes gets awards from the Republican Jewish Colition, which gives such visionaries as Tom Delay free trips to Israel.

There is one ethnic group which will never be ridiculed on Fox, or ABC, or NBC, or any radio, or any newspapers or movies, which always cast the muslim/arab as the evil destroy the world bad guy (Iron Man). All others are fair game.

The anti defamation league consideres any critisism of Israel and its ethnic cleansing programme anti-semitism. Funny how that correlates to any critisism of Fox or the Persian War is unpatriotic.

Maybe someone can explain to me, who's the more rabbid zionist, evangelical endtimers or media mogal neocons?

avatar
Reply

And one final S.I.N.K. just to make sure this one sided slop

has been biotch slapped good and hard.

avatar
Reply

The question is, why isn't this article front page in the other national news channels?

Maybe General Electric/NBC and CBS/westinghouse/microsoft and ABC/Universal/Eisner/Israel and Viacom/Limbaugh/Cable/right wing radio/US and World Report and all of the national news papers, all of the Hollowood mogals, both owners and operators don't give a crap about anything but what makes them money.

Sell the controversy. Sell the point of view journalism.

What red state hillbilly doesn't like a good swiftboating of some academic. They are all playing to the walmart trash, the biggest market there is.

Science and professional thoughtful study on issues, yeah, but lets put him up against the Evangelical preacher, now that sells.

avatar
Reply

Perhaps they don't want to raise a fuss at Temple on Saturday. It wouldn't look good to have the evangelical red state trash aware of who's feeding them the psy ops programme propaganda. Lets pretend to fight. Maybe if we control the spin, we can get another tax cut, and hence more donations to the RJC.

1

Add Comment

You must log in first to post a comment. Secure Signin

Not a member? Sign-up today!


Who voted on this story?

View all (68) »

Who sunk this story?

Channels
AnchorsArt & DesignAutos
BooksCareers & JobsCelebrities
Do No EvilDo-It-YourselfFamily
FoodGadgets & TechGay & Lesbian
Health & FitnessHumorLove & Personals
MenMoneyMovies
MusicNewsPets
PoliticsPopular VideosReal Estate
ReligionScienceShopping
SportsTelevisionTravel
VideoVideo GamesWomen