Why won't Congress consider impeaching Pres. Bush? »
Posted by: TechnologyExpert 2 months, 3 weeks ago"Here's my question to you: What does it mean when Congress refuses to even consider 35 articles of impeachment against President Bush?"
Read Full Story at caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com
Join the Discussion 
+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 26
-
0%
TechnologyExpert2 months, 3 weeks ago
Propeller screwed up the URL by removing some special characters. Thus, the only way to see the story - and it's interesting - is via this TinyURL link:
I know, TinyURL is offlimits, but Propeller screwed things up.
Reply-
-
0%
injest2 months, 3 weeks ago
FTA
"They voted largely along party lines â;; 255 to 166 â;; to send the resolution to the House Judiciary Committee. This is exactly what happened to Kucinich's impeachment articles against Vice President Cheney last year."
Wait, WTF, "exactly what happened to Kucinich's impeachment articles against Vice President Cheney last year"
Uhm that vote the Republicans voted FOR impeachment and the Dems scrambled to kill it oops send it to committee.
What was the 255 to 166 split this time? Was it
255 Reps to 166 Dems? That's what happened last year!
Blahhhh OMG this just gets better and better
ROFLMAO
Reply
-
-
-
-
0%
donald512 months, 3 weeks ago
Only a repug congress has in the past tried to impeach! Only repugs would rather tear down the office of the president for their own political gain!
The longer Dumya is in the job, the greater the lesson of Repug bigoptry, futility and ineffectiveness! Yes, thank you Dumya, and all the repug congressmen who lock step voted for you for almost 8 years now, for showing us you really are leader of a terrorist organization that should be banned in America!
Reply -
0%
Harbeas2 months, 3 weeks ago
Congress has much more important issues to deal with(and they aren't dealing with them either). The man will be out of office in less than six months. Let's move on to, the price of oil, the housing crisis, joblessness, taxes, crime, drugs, illegal immigration and voting in politicians who will act on these issues and many others.
Reply-
0%
unome22 months, 3 weeks ago
Let's let congress move on to more important issues like the lies that tricked the American people into an unjust war against an innocent Iraqi civilian population and the hundreds of thousands murdered for no reason. Or perhaps they could discuss America breaking away from the Geneva Conventions and supporting torture and secret prisons. Or perhaps they could discuss war profiteering and no-bid contracts that have enriched our leaders. Or they could discuss the failures that led to 9-11.
Reply
-
-
-
0%
agoodlibertian2 months, 3 weeks ago
Actually it is the dumbest of republicans who can not see the many crimes that the Bush administration has committed. We have showned you the list and proof of the crimes but you republicans refuse to see the truth. Will you people ever see the truth, it is my hope that one day you will but for now you are just to brainwashed to see it and that is a shame, not just for you republicans but unfortuately for america as well.
Reply-
0%
injest2 months, 3 weeks ago
"Actually it is the dumbest of republicans who can not see the many crimes that the Bush administration has committed."
Did you read the article?
Did you understand the article?
Did you realize the Repubs FOR bringing 35 articles of impeachment against President Bush?
Do you realize that means they voted the same as Kucinich?
Obviously not.
Reply
-
-
-
gbilly08Comment removed: User banned.
-
0%
woodguru2 months, 3 weeks ago
The infringements and breaches are there, I don't think dems or pubes want to hurt their elections, although Republicans definitely need a smoke screen, their guy is looking bad and seems to be smelling worse every day. Obama looks better as you actually dig into his past, first black president of the Harvard Law Review, any high paying law firm or supreme court clerkship he wanted but he chose to work for the community for no money instead. He is with his first wife and has no history of cheating to match the illustriously colorful resume of McCain.
Oh the criminal investigations could go on and on but it doesn't really do any good except to possibly make it easier to repeal a lot of the more insidious big money giveaways that have been committed to through the next twenty and thirty years. how about oil companies still having 17 billion dollars in tax breaks coming over the next 10 years? Bush has committed money that will continue to be going out for decades, repeal, repeal
Reply -
0%
aniokly2 months, 3 weeks ago
Call your congressman. They will explain all this to you, or maybe they will just lie to you. Either way you gen an answer.
Reply -
KvilleTXComment removed: User banned.
-
KvilleTXComment removed: User banned.
-
0%
fotoman11334062 months, 3 weeks ago
Guys,
Georgie WILL NEVER be impeached; cause he "BOUGHT" the presidency. Money can/does get you anything.
Reply
Submitted By:
TechnologyExpert
I am Editor-in-Chief at Alice Hill's RealTechNews (http://www.realtechnews.com). I also have my own blog (Tech-Ex) at http://TechnologyExpert.Blogspot.com. Finally ...
Also submitted:
- 1.0 - Federal Highway Fund About to Run Out of Money
- 2.7 - U.S. to take control of mortgage giants: reports
- 1.0 - Best Buy's iPhone-y "Deal"
- 1.0 - Gooping on denture cream can be health hazard
Related Articles:
Why not submit a story?
Also Propping This Article
MidnightPrism
Helixbuilder
ciera-marie
berkeley
Ratskii- TGrass3001
joey-evans
david_nwpa- Harbeas
uncle-dave
Groups Watching This
No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your group?
