Got feedback on the new design? We're Listening! Send us Feedback

Antonin Scalia and police-state rule »

Posted by: sandyenglish 2 months, 3 weeks ago

9 Comments Report this Story

1.3

Scale of 1 to 10

Read: 33

Propped: 15

Comments: 9

Click Prop It to Raise Score
Prop it

The four dissenting Supreme Court justices, John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Joseph Alito, defend the right of the Bush administration to proceed in its "war on terror" with utter disregard for the Constitution and elementary democratic rights. They are, in essence, proponents of authoritarian rule. The savagery at Guant&

Read Full Story at wsws.org

Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 9
  • 0%
    miklkit2 months, 3 weeks ago

    Dumbya has already said that the Constitution is "just a g%d#a*ed piece of paper". Apparently Scalia, Roberts, and McSame agree with him.

    Reply

    4 Replies

    • 0%
      donald512 months, 3 weeks ago

      ...yes, the big supporters of the Unitary Executive! I wonder how they will change their position when a Dem takes the white House! Heck, on second thought, I don't wonder, I know they will change their tune as the repugs always do when it comes to the other party!

      Reply

      3 Replies

  • 0%
    jordan112 months, 3 weeks ago

    The four dissenters are Federalist Society members. It would be a very good idea for Americans to investigate what that means.

    Reply
    • 0%
      sinophil492 months, 3 weeks ago

      Antonin Scalia should be impeached. His job is to protect the constitution and interpret rulings in the spirit of our foundig fathers.

      If he truly believes in this Carl Schmitt that a legal system founded on a fixed piece of paper is unstable, then he does not believe in the duties of his job.

      Reply
      • 0%
        hefaa12 months, 3 weeks ago

        John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Joseph Alito are criminals. All four should be impeached for abuse of power.

        Reply
        • 0%
          TrueProgressive2 months, 2 weeks ago

          FTA: It is well known that Scalia's approach to legal issues is unprincipled and cynical. Scalia decides his cases on the basis of political convictions, which are rabidly antidemocratic, and then works backward to concoct a sophistical justification for the objective he has decided on in advance. . . . He is a thug in black robes . . ."

          How true, how true, how true. My dream is to see that SOB forceably evicted from the Supreme Court bench.

          Reply

          You must be signed in to post a comment. Sign in »

          Submitted By:
          sandyenglish

          Also submitted:

          Related Articles:

          Why not submit a story?

          Also Propping This Article

          view all »

          Groups Watching This

          No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your group?

          Advertisement