Got feedback on the new design? We're Listening! Send us Feedback

The shifting sands of freedom »

Posted by: berkeley 2 months ago

2 Comments Report this Story

5.3

Scale of 1 to 10

Read: 57

Propped: 33

Comments: 2

Click Prop It to Raise Score
Prop it

A supervisory state claims it must, for our security, monitor who we talk to, regulate what we read or say, wherever it has the power to record. It "must" because it can. Civil and political liberties aren't tradeable for physical security. They are the sole reason we have it.

Read Full Story at guardian.co.uk

Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 2
  • 0%
    tehranchik2 months ago

    Dennis Kucinich was the ONLY one in the debates to state that our civil liberties were more important than security! Remember that?

    Reply

    1 Reply

    • 0%
      memestryker2 months ago

      Too bad Kucinich's a strong supporter of gun bans. I consider my right to keep and bear arms for self-defense to be a civil liberty, too.

      Reply

    You must be signed in to post a comment. Sign in »

    Submitted By:
    berkeley

    If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. Of all the enemies to public ...

    Also submitted:

    Related Articles:

    Why not submit a story?

    Also Propping This Article

    view all »

    Groups Watching This

    No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your group?

    Advertisement