Lieberman: After Iran wipes out Israel and 'Arab countries' in the Middle East, 'we're next!' »
Posted By TechnologyExpert 3 months ago in NewsWhen host George Stephanopoulos asked if Israel should then attack Iran, Lieberman said, "That's up to Israel," warning that Iran not only represents an "existential threat" to Israel but also the Middle East and the United States.
Read Full Story at thinkprogress.org »
Submitted By:
TechnologyExpert
I am Editor-in-Chief at Alice Hill's RealTechNews (http://www.realtechnews.com). I also have my own blog (Tech-Ex) at http://TechnologyExpert.Blogspot.com. Finally ...
Also submitted:
Related Articles:
Why not submit a story?
Join the Discussion 
+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 38
-
-
-
0%
antibrainwasher3 months ago
Lieberman, zionist before american, every time. One nation, under the star of david.
Vote Lieberman, vote gods chosen people, vote your children to die for aparthied ethnically cleansed Israel, vote to sent another 100 billion for Israel, pay no attention to the AIPAC, the richest and most powerful lobby in the country, despite the fact jews account for 3% of America, pay no attention the to billions pouring into American Enterprise insititute, neocon central, pay no attention to Dual Citizen presiential advisers who are running both parties. Pay no attention that the american news media is owned and operated 100% by conservative zionists, 100% for profit only, except editing out anything anti-Israeli. Pay no attention to the antidefimation league, which considers any critizism of Israel antisemitism.
Every patriotic american should sign up their children to die for Israel, to protect the racially pure religious state, where citizenship is based on gods chosen DNA.
Reply
-
-
0%
spkguy3 months ago
jordan11
"What an idiot lieberman is."
He's not only an idiot, he's a very dangerous idiot!
Question: Why does the mainstream media give Lieberman a pass on this?
Senator Lieberman compares Hagee to Moses
http://youtube.com/watch?v=b-ttnadMKf0
Reply
-
-
0%
bubba23 months ago
Well, he may be that, but he is also DANGEROUS - he is as corrupted and crooked as Bush and Cheney.
Reply -
0%
Thinker223 months ago
So Lieberman is an "idiot", "moron", "DANGEROUS", "corrupted and crooked". Very well.
Now... can someone tell me WHAT DID HE SAY THAT WAS WRONG?
Reply-
0%
bubba23 months ago
He is for staying in Iraq. And - by the way - when Lamont was threatening to get his Senate seat from him, Lieberman said during that 2006 campaign that he was for bringing home the troops in a 12-16 month timetable. I think they call that "flip-flopping" ...
He is for attacking Iran - he is a fearmonger just like the Bush administration. (Read the article)
There is NO evidence - NEVER has been - that Iran is attempting to build any nuclear weapons. There is NO evidence of administration accusations that Iran has been supplying weapons to Shia militants in Iraq.
Lieberman still praises John Hagee, who calls the Catholic Church the great wh*re, called Adolf Hitler a "hunter" whose Holocaust was part of a divine plan to drive Jews from Europe to Palestine, and has said that the nuclear attack on Iran that he favors will lead to the deaths of most Jews in Israel.
Need any more?
Reply-
0%
Thinker223 months ago
> He is for staying in Iraq.
Did HE say it? or it's YOU who is saying it?
> He is for attacking Iran...
Attacking PEACEFUL Iran? Did HE say it? or it's YOU who is saying it?
> There is NO evidence - NEVER has been - that Iran is attempting to build any nuclear weapons.
Of course... and I'm still waiting for you to explain how will Iran possibly use those nuclear-capable ballistic missiles without warheads. Any ideas?
> Lieberman still praises John Hagee...
> Need any more?
Yes. I need HIS words, not YOURS.
Reply
-
-
-
-
0%
Thinker223 months ago
> The president of Iran NEVER said anything about "wiping Israel off the map".
This is correct. He said something about "the regime in Jerusalem will disappear from the map of times". Can you explain the MEANING of his words?
In the meantime please consider that the President of Iran DID say a couple of other things, probably, worse than "wiping the regime in Jerusalem from the map of times":
http://jihadwatch.org/archives/014916.php
Read the links there.
Reply
-
-
-
0%
vor3 months ago
He is just miming the neocon line. Clucking like a chicken with a fox loose in the henhouse. The irony is that the real fox is the neocon belief. Hard to dispute whether Ahmadinejad has used threatening rhetoric, certainly he has, but it has always been used in a defensive posture. He doesn't have a real strategic threat. Even if they had the bomb they would (as any such armed nation) be subject to the MAD logic that has prevailed for decades. A very tough equation to get around. Their biggest weapon is the effect an attack on Iran would have on the world economy. Especially if the Strait of Hormuz is closed. Can you say $300 plus a barrel? Disaster for the financial markets. Stability would be a notion of the past.
Reply -
-
0%
JoseMadre3 months ago
Now I remember why I call you guys leftitards. For some reason you fail to see what the President of Iranis so insane that Khomeini considered him a cultist (think about THAT!). The guy is a big time sponsor of Hezbollah and other terrorist orgs. He would think nothing of giving a nuke to one of these groups for use in Tel Aviv. Or London. Or New York.
Reply-
0%
agoodlibertian3 months ago
How do you know that, have you spoken directly to either Ahmadinejad or knomeini and ask them if they get the bomb are they going to give the bomb(a very expensive device)to some organization so that wwiii begins. Only a moron would think that.
Reply
-
Add a Comment
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.