Join the Discussion

Comments So Far: 2

• gbilly08Comment removed: User banned.
• 0%

  memestryker1 month, 3 weeks ago

  I agree that greenhouse gases are a serious problem. And I also agree with EPA--the Clean Air Act is not the way to address it.

  Population control, tax-incentives for using alternative energy sources in buildings and vehicles, incentives to stop slash and burn agriculture, finding ways to recycle and reduce consumption instead of chopping down every tree on the planet, and taxing large homes and cars that waste fuel would probably do exponentially more than another rule calling for reductions in air pollution.

  The Supreme Court is way off the turf the Founders intended by stipulating how to solve such a complex problem. Of course, they have recently been finding the Constitution itself unconstitutional, rather than doing their job, so we are open to illegal searches and seizures, church and state are forever entangled, and we almost lost our right to self-defense.

  Start with incentives to reduce the population--that's where the big rewards lie.

  Reply